[governance] Brief update on MAG meeting on IGF retreat

[williams.deirdre at gmail.com]

Dear Jac,
Thank you. Very helpful
De

Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone.
  Original Message  
From: Jac sm Kee
Sent: Thursday, 2 June 2016 03:51
To: Governance; <bestbits at lists.bestbits.net>
Reply To: governance at lists.igcaucus.org
Subject: [governance] Brief update on MAG meeting on IGF retreat

Hello everyone,

Sharing a brief update from the MAG meeting discussing the retreat last
night.

The concerns around short timeline, problematics around representation
and participation, interest in knowing about content as well as outputs
of the process, broad participation were raised also in the meeting.

Some suggestions were put forth to address some of this, in summary:

* That the retreat not be seen as something that makes decisions, but
rather the start of articulating the process for a strategic plan. So
part of the "journey" of IGF improvements that has begun many years ago,
with the opportunity of a 10 year mandate
* That an open process be provided for inputs to shape the agenda
(including e.g. CSTD recommednaitons, WSIS + 10 doc)
* Remote participation in some way is important to promote transparency
and participation, and the need to balance this against smaller space
for brainstorming work as forwarded by some (live tweeting, remote
participation at some point every day)
* That outputs be open for comments and inputs by everyone
* That there be clarity around what happens next with these outputs -
roles and responsibilities
* And that recommendations and suggestions on how to make the retreat
work is open for consultation and inputs

I think that's it. May have missed out on some, but hope this gives a
gist of the conversation. Also happy to bring any further thoughts or
recommendations to the MAG space.

j

---------------------------------
Jac sm Kee
Manager, Women's Rights Programme
Association for Progressive Communications
www.apc.org | www.takebackthetech.net | erotics.apc.org
Jitsi: jacsmk | Skype: jacsmk | Twitter: @jhybe

On 01/06/2016 18:23, Nicolás Echániz wrote:
> On 06/01/2016 07:03 AM, Chat Garcia Ramilo wrote:
>> Therefore, I'd like to encourage you all to send us your nominees. If
>> you have other issues to raise please share them as well.
> 
> 
> One issue, that maybe is a bit late to raise by now is that doing this
> meeting in the USA is a poor choice. The visa process is difficult, time
> consuming and expensive to people in many countries.
> 
> This in combination with the short notice and lack of preliminary
> discussion... is a bad combination.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> APC.members mailing list
> Info and options: http://lists.apc.org/mailman/listinfo/apc.members
> --------------------------------------
> Temporary access to APC Member Meeting page: http://meeting.apc.org/tiki/tiki-index.php?page=APCcm2014-December
> user: apc-member
> pswd: apc2014!
> --------------------------------------
> All conversations that take place on this list are considered confidential. As a member of the APC network, you are expected to respect this confidentiality. If you wish to circulate or quote a post from the APC.members list in any other space or forum, you MUST receive permission from the person who made the quote first on the APC.members listserv.
> 
> 




-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t