[governance] IGF retreat starts

Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro salanieta.tamanikaiwaimaro at gmail.com
Sat Jul 16 08:16:57 EDT 2016


meant to say 8.30am till 10.30pm some of us even later.

On 16/07/2016 8:16 am, "Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro" <
salanieta.tamanikaiwaimaro at gmail.com> wrote:

> I won't get into the mechanics save to say there was a call for comments
> and input into the process.
>
> I can assure you that civil society is on equal footing within the retreat
> and we are being heard. Contributions that came in are on the IGF
> website...we are working from 8.30am  (some of us earlier) till 10.30am
> making sure nothing gets missed or falls within the cracks.
>
> The retreat is organised in a manner that makes it easy and free-flowing
> to have unfiltered discussions (Chatham house rules) and having the frank
> conversations we find we have to find ways to work together across
> Multistakeholder in spite of the differences. It is simply a creative and
> brainstorming session. The reason for not sending a commentary is because
> anything could be misinterpreted or taken out of context and so to remove
> the danger of adding to the misapprehension it is best that we wait for the
> completion of the matter which will be open for input from all.
>
> I know it's difficult but you have to trust that civil society reps:
>
> Anriette
> Nnenna
> Lea
> Stuart
> Sala
> Kossi
>
> are raising that which needs to be raised and if u feel heavily about any
> agenda item on the website today feel free to send all 5 of us a note.
>
> Sala
>
> On 16/07/2016 7:50 am, "Johan Helsingius" <julf at julf.com> wrote:
>
>> Dear Sala,
>>
>> > I can assure you that once synthesis of
>> > what is being discussed is approved for dissemination and call for
>> > inputs will be asked from the broader community to think about
>> > mechanisms for improvement.
>>
>> I think some of us were hoping for commentary on the
>> actual discussions, not just the finished "approved for
>> dissemination" end product - but I guess that reflects
>> the classic bottom-up vs. top-down approach dilemma.
>>
>> Kind regards,
>>
>>         Julf
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ____________________________________________________________
>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>>      governance at lists.igcaucus.org
>> To be removed from the list, visit:
>>      http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
>>
>> For all other list information and functions, see:
>>      http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
>> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
>>      http://www.igcaucus.org/
>>
>> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20160716/20c6bc03/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t


More information about the Governance mailing list