[governance] [bestbits] US Support for Multistakeholder Governance is Conditional on US Remaining in Control

[Seth Johnson]

Pleased to hear that the topic of jurisdiction shifting came up again.

I specifically criticized the misframing of the jurisdiction issue in
the CCWG-Accountability group's Paris meeting a few weeks back.


Seth

On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 7:11 AM, Pranesh Prakash <pranesh at cis-india.org> wrote:
> At a meeting with civil society actors, Larry Strickling of the US NTIA was
> asked by my colleague Padmini whether the US Congress would support the
> multistakeholder model if ICANN's jurisdiction were to shift.
>
> He said that it wouldn't.
>
> https://twitter.com/pranesh/status/656422297876561921
>
> --
> Pranesh Prakash
> Policy Director, Centre for Internet and Society
> http://cis-india.org | tel:+91 80 40926283
> sip:pranesh at ostel.co | xmpp:pranesh at cis-india.org
> https://twitter.com/pranesh
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>      bestbits at lists.bestbits.net.
> To unsubscribe or change your settings, visit:
>      http://lists.bestbits.net/wws/info/bestbits

-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t