[governance] Debunking eight myths about multi-stakeholderism

Suresh Ramasubramanian suresh at hserus.net
Fri May 1 05:01:20 EDT 2015


Add a single extra question - who is / are the targets of active attempts to disenfranchise them from a process?

> On 01-May-2015, at 2:11 pm, Mawaki Chango <kichango at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> And in addition to the question about who is a stakeholder - who is enfranchisable and do they get enfranchised? - there is the question of who is listened to? Are the stakeholders equally listened to or are some "more equally" listened to than others? [1] In my experience, assuming we have clear answers to Barry's great questions, this remains a persistent challenge in MS processes where people consistently tend to listen more other people they are culturally acquainted with. At times the risk of a MS setting turning into a club is palpable.
> 
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20150501/f6a5001c/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t


More information about the Governance mailing list