[governance] Debunking eight myths about multi-stakeholderism
Suresh Ramasubramanian
suresh at hserus.net
Fri May 1 05:01:20 EDT 2015
Add a single extra question - who is / are the targets of active attempts to disenfranchise them from a process?
> On 01-May-2015, at 2:11 pm, Mawaki Chango <kichango at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> And in addition to the question about who is a stakeholder - who is enfranchisable and do they get enfranchised? - there is the question of who is listened to? Are the stakeholders equally listened to or are some "more equally" listened to than others? [1] In my experience, assuming we have clear answers to Barry's great questions, this remains a persistent challenge in MS processes where people consistently tend to listen more other people they are culturally acquainted with. At times the risk of a MS setting turning into a club is palpable.
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20150501/f6a5001c/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
For all other list information and functions, see:
http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
http://www.igcaucus.org/
Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
More information about the Governance
mailing list