[governance] IANA transition - BR Gov comments on the CCWG-Accountability Draft Proposal

[Seth Johnson]

A good point.  I'm only seeing your last two messages coming in with
no pieces of the messages you're replying to, so it's hard to get the
referentiality of your comments though.  The pattern of reply
recipients in your header on this message seems to suggest it was a
reply to me.  But it's hard to know what parts you're qualifying or
amplifying.  Your previous message looks like several inline responses
and the reply recipients make it look like you're responding to pieces
of what Michael said.

On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 2:05 PM, Barry Shein <bzs at world.std.com> wrote:
>
> I'll go one step further and state that any internet governance
> structure (of any substance) which requires primarily in-person
> meetings is by its nature rigged.
>
> All structures -- legislative, executive, legal, etc -- should be
> designed from the start for online participation alone with any
> exception being exactly that: An exception and for good reason.
>
> Why remove the very essence of the power of the net, remote and
> ubiquitious participation, just when the participation and
> enfranchisement becomes most important?
>
> --
>         -Barry Shein
>
> The World              | bzs at TheWorld.com           | http://www.TheWorld.com
> Purveyors to the Trade | Voice: 800-THE-WRLD        | Dial-Up: US, PR, Canada
> Software Tool & Die    | Public Access Internet     | SINCE 1989     *oo*

-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t