[governance] India

[Suresh Ramasubramanian]

I meant "from a government of India stand". As that article points out earlier Indian government efforts in this direction were kind of bipolar with some few on this list apparently favouring the proclamations made by one camp that favoured multilateral and UN centric while another camp endorsed multi stakeholder

Stakeholder consultations in India are still something of a joke, regardless d the party in power, but anyway ..

--srs

> On 06-Jul-2015, at 7:52 pm, McTim <dogwallah at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 3:56 AM, Suresh Ramasubramanian
> <suresh at hserus.net> wrote:
>> Multistakeholder is not new.
> 
> 
> Correct, it is the way that names, numbers and protocols have been
> developed for the last 35ish years.
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Cheers,
> 
> McTim
> "A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A
> route indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel
> 
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
> To be removed from the list, visit:
>     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
> 
> For all other list information and functions, see:
>     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
>     http://www.igcaucus.org/
> 
> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t

-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t