[governance] FW: Towards an Internet Social Forum

[Akinremi Peter Taiwo]

Hey Michael,

    I can see the passion behind ISF and which is a good idea but....can't
these so called issues be address by existing civil society groups. I would
say that the issues parmider, and others want to address can be address if
the existing civil society groups can agree on a common ground.

I could see very well that most of the people behind ISF aren't in support
of NMI.

My questions is aren't we creating complexity for ourselves in the name of
not letting WEF from controlling the internet? Do you think it is possible
not allowing them getting involve?

I believe what we are all striving for is bottom up approach and
involvement of every stakeholders participation and that's why we have some
civil stakeholders on board to keep the NMI in the direction of bottom up
approach.

Also forming ISF, how do you intend steering NMI in good hope in favour of
every stakeholders?.

Hoping to hear from you.

Peter.
On Jan 25, 2015 1:19 PM, "michael gurstein" <gurstein at gmail.com> wrote:

> Coverage of the ISF in an Indian daily
>
> *M*
>
>
> http://www.deccanherald.com/content/455369/towards-democratic-internet-governance.html
> Towards democratic Internet governance
>
>    - 1 min read
>    -
>
> Shruthi H M, Bengaluru, Jan 24, 2015, DHNS:
>
> *The Internet might have pervaded the common man's life but its governance
> still remains in the hands of a few corporate giants. To counter this,
> civil society organisations propose democratic Internet governance. *
>
> Though Google’s Eric Schmidt predicts the “disappearance of Internet into
> the background”, a group of organisations have set out to bring to fore
> voices that have remained in the background in spite of the Internet’s all
> pervasive nature.As the World Economic Forum (WEF) 2015 is in progress in
> Davos (Jan 21-24), civil society organisations have come together to create
> a global ‘Internet Social Forum’ countering the WEF's NETmundial initiative
> for Internet governance. The organisations aim to create an Internet space
> governed in public interest.
>
> Bengaluru-based organisation IT for Change will be an active part of this
> global forum, along with five other Indian organisations: Society For
> Knowledge Commons, All India Peoples Science Network, Free Software
> Movement of India, SLFC.in and Digital Empowrment Foundation.
>
> The Internet Social Forum will consist of civil society organisations from
> across the globe who believe that Internet governance should not be limited
> to the vested interests of corporate giants. Their endeavour is to put in
> place a “bottom's up” approach, where grassroots groups can have their say
> in regulating Internet space.
>
> Civil organisations feel that the WEF’s global internet policy making and
> governance initiative the ‘NETmundial’, restricts itself to the voices of
> the global elite. The concept of WEF itself has been countered by the
> “World Social Forum” and the Internet Social Forum draws inspiration from
> it. In fact, the “preparatory process” of the forum is likely to be held in
> March 2015 in Tunis, during the World Social Forum meet.
>
> When one searches for something on the Internet, the most popular links
> related to the subject appear at the top of the list.
>
> However, more often links that appear first are not guided by popularity
> but by the money invested by interested parties to ensure they are
> displayed on top. In this regard, the Internet Social Forum will fight for
> “Net neutrality”.
>
> IT For Change Executive Director Parminder Jeet Singh said, “In its
> current form, internet governance has not yet become a people's movement.
> The Internet is increasingly controlled by corporates.”
>
> Community owned broadband, data ownership, limits to copyright and
> including rural communities in the dialogue process are some of the issues
> that the forum seeks to address.
>
> Rishab Bailey, Director (legal), Society For Knowledge Commons, added that
> such an initiative was significant as, at present, a lot of thought is
> going into setting up institutions for Internet governance. “We have to
> ensure a representative and democratic Internet governance. Internet is a
> global construct and it touches all our lives. As of now there are no
> concrete mechanisms to deal with issues pertaining to Internet governance.
> We have to make sure that Internet governance is a true bottoms up
> approach.”
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>      governance at lists.igcaucus.org
> To be removed from the list, visit:
>      http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
>
> For all other list information and functions, see:
>      http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
>      http://www.igcaucus.org/
>
> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20150126/76f7d6ca/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t