[governance] Google to Censor Blogposts

[Barry Shein]

From: Suresh Ramasubramanian <suresh at hserus.net>
>Given that they are the ones stuck with policing all the nude content and s=
>eparating the drunk nude selfie bloggers from the upskirt voyeurs / revenge=
> porn site operators / child abuse perpetrators from the scholarly discussa=
>nts of the precise way to achieve the flexibility necessary to perform sex =
>acts described in the kamasutra ...=20
>
>I can understand their blanket ban, though I don't necessarily condone it.

Whatever happened to the theory that if you act as the censor then you
can be held responsible for the content (e.g., failure to perform
liability when some kid gets porn this way anyhow)?

Did that have no legal basis? Is there any case trail?

-- 
        -Barry Shein

The World              | bzs at TheWorld.com           | http://www.TheWorld.com
Purveyors to the Trade | Voice: 800-THE-WRLD        | Dial-Up: US, PR, Canada
Software Tool & Die    | Public Access Internet     | SINCE 1989     *oo*

-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t