[governance] The NTIA announcement (re: IANA, DNS root)

[Louis Pouzin (well)]

Hi colleagues,

Nothing new really since last year.

As predicted the US gov is meandering to keep the status quo till the next
administration comes up to speed, mid 2017 or later.

Meantime if some countries want to acquire their cyber-sovereignty, they'd
better building it for themselves, possibly with other like minded
countries, rather than getting more colonized with such scams as TTP or
TTIP.

Louis
- - -

On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 6:19 PM, Pranesh Prakash <pranesh at cis-india.org>
wrote:

> Dear all,
> Please make sure you read this post by Milton (excellent, as always).
>
> While I highly recommend reading the entire post, for the TL;DR crowd:
>
> [snip]
>
>> The most interesting part of the announcement, however, was not the
>> extension itself but the way the NTIA has finally started to come to grips
>> with the role of Verisign and changes in the root zone management process.
>> Along with the extension announcement, NTIA published a proposal “Root Zone
>> Administrator Proposal Related to the IANA Functions Stewardship
>> Transition.” As we noted in a blog post back in March 2014, it is really
>> the Verisign Cooperative Agreement, not the IANA functions contract, that
>> gives the US government authority over all root zone file changes. It is
>> Verisign, not ICANN, that has operational control of the root zone, so if
>> the Cooperative Agreement with Verisign doesn’t go away, neither does U.S.
>> control of the DNS root.
>>
> [/snip]
>
> [snip]
>
>> To conclude, the NTIA-ICANN-Verisign triumvirate seems inconsistent with
>> the overall ethos of open, bottom up development of a transition plan.
>> There are reasons why this is a sticky issue, of course. Still, the U.S.
>> government and ICANN have to be very careful about how they handle this. If
>> the “global multi-stakeholder community” invoked by the original transition
>> announcement goes through an arduous process to replace the IANA functions
>> contract only to learn that Verisign and NTIA still have a compact that
>> gives the U.S. control of root zone changes, their credibility – and the
>> credibility of the entire process model used to develop the transition –
>> will be shot, and the ‘transition’ will have done more damage than good to
>> globalizing Internet governance.
>>
> [/snip]
>
> Regards,
> Pranesh
>
> Mueller, Milton L <milton.mueller at pubpolicy.gatech.edu> [2015-08-20
> 20:39:28 +0000]:
>
> My analysis of the latest NTIA announcement: "What's going on between
>> NTIA, ICANN and Verisign?"
>>
>> http://www.internetgovernance.org/2015/08/18/whats-going-on-between-ntia-icann-and-verisign/
>>
>
> --
> Pranesh Prakash
> Policy Director, Centre for Internet and Society
> http://cis-india.org | tel:+91 80 40926283
> sip:pranesh at ostel.co | xmpp:pranesh at cis-india.org
> https://twitter.com/pranesh_prakash
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20150829/53a643a8/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t