FW: [governance] Tweedledum andTweedledee WAS Re: Time-sensitive: 24 hour sign on period forITU Plenipot joint recommendations

michael gurstein gurstein at gmail.com
Sun Oct 26 19:18:46 EDT 2014


With permission…

 

M

 

From: projectallende at gmail.com [mailto:projectallende at gmail.com] On Behalf Of Project Allende
Sent: Sunday, October 26, 2014 3:26 PM
To: rhill at hill-a.ch
Cc: michael gurstein; JNC Forum
Subject: Re: <DKIM> Re: [JNC - Forum] [bestbits] FW: [governance] Tweedledum andTweedledee WAS Re: Time-sensitive: 24 hour sign on period forITU Plenipot joint recommendations

 

Be afraid, be very afraid 
(or at least very wary).

I'm sure I don't need to tell seasoned negotiators like yourselves but Multi Stakeholderism is, in my experience, an insidious but effective approach (similar to the new trend in corporate/government fora such as the WEF or the annual Davos meetings) where corporates play a state-like role in many decision-making spheres thereby giving them direct decision-making (veto blocking, or conversation orienting) capabilities in regulatory decisions (typically those which affect their profits). 

Examples include big data and those same corporate's abilities to use certain technologies (such as profiling/personalisation meta-data) which may be considered by many governments part of their own regulatory or security interest. 

For people (like myself) who work in the ecology realm: multi-stakeholderism has been all the rage in the United Nations when it comes to Green tech and light touch "corporate responsibility" (anti command and control) "market-based" approaches to prevent effective action on climate change. Corporates as stake-holders (with a kind of one-dollar-one-vote notion of democracy) are often involved directly (or in parallel processes) in the world's climate change negotiations such as the COP UNFCCC processes currently in Peru and soon to play live in Paris. 

Having a seat at the table allows the corporate stakeholders to help prevent any serious democratic or government regulation from happening by being capable of stopping the regulation in their tracks. From my experience in monitoring the post-2015 UN Processes and even more so the Rio+20 corporate green-tech takeover, this multi-stakeholderism is a sort of deep pocketed capability of affecting any possible profit-negative decisions in the regulatory processes that ultimately affect all of our lives.

Tony

 

_______________________________________________
Forum mailing list
Forum at justnetcoalition.org
http://justnetcoalition.org/mailman/listinfo/forum_justnetcoalition.org


-- 

Tony Phillips

Coordinating Editor; 
Europe on the Brink; 
Debt, Crisis and Dissent in the European Periphery: Zed Books <http://www.zedbooks.co.uk/paperback/europe-on-the-brink> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20141026/1e23d084/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t


More information about the Governance mailing list