[governance] URGENT: Last call for feedback on CS participation in NETmundial Initiative

Sivasubramanian M isolatedn at gmail.com
Tue Nov 18 08:59:10 EST 2014


Fully agree with Wolfgang here

Sivasubramanian M

Sivasubramanian M <https://www.facebook.com/sivasubramanian.muthusamy>

On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 6:56 PM, "Kleinwächter, Wolfgang" <
wolfgang.kleinwaechter at medienkomm.uni-halle.de> wrote:

> Thanks Mawaki,
>
> As a former Co-Chair of the IGC, I support the involvement of our Caucus
> in the NMI. I see this as an opportunity to contribute to IG processes
> towards objectives which has been on the IGC Agenda since ist creation in
> June 2003: Bridging the digital divide and a human rights based free, open
> and unfragmented Internet with access for everybody. NMI is a good platform
> - based on the Sao Paulo principles - to strengthen privacy and right to
> freedom of expression.
>
> Wolfgang
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: governance-request at lists.igcaucus.org im Auftrag von Mawaki Chango
> Gesendet: Di 18.11.2014 12:32
> An: Internet Governance
> Betreff: [governance] URGENT: Last call for feedback on CS participation
> in NETmundial Initiative
>
> Dear All,
>
> You must have heard a good deal about this by now, so I won't repeat the
> background details. In the middle of the night last night, before hitting
> the bed after a long and drawn out day playing catch-up with deadlines, I
> saw that Ian (chair of CSCG) forwarded the NMI Transitional Committee's
> reply the CSCG enquiry. Basically, they are willing to let the CSCG vet CS
> candidates to be part of the NMI Coordination Council.
>
> Now the question before us is to get a feel of the membership of CSCG
> member entities as to whether to get involved in the NMI process or not. I
> believe this is the last step in the consultations we've been having (with
> NMI initiators, among ourselves at the CSCG and with the membership of our
> respective organizations.) After this we should be able to give a definite
> answer, formulate a definite position about our participation in the NMI
> process.
>
> So what do you think? Please get right to the point and be brief. State
> your preference for IGC Involvement or No involvement and, if you care to
> provide us with such, I would be grateful to you if you could keep your
> supporting argument in one short paragraph (as we just want to take the
> "temperature of the room" if you see what I mean.)
>
> Thank you for your understanding.
> Best regards.
>
> Mawaki
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>      governance at lists.igcaucus.org
> To be removed from the list, visit:
>      http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
>
> For all other list information and functions, see:
>      http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
>      http://www.igcaucus.org/
>
> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20141118/3627e31c/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t


More information about the Governance mailing list