[governance] India and Multistakehoolderism

[parminder]

On Wednesday 05 November 2014 05:07 PM, McTim wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 8:54 PM, parminder <parminder at itforchange.net> wrote:
>> On Tuesday 04 November 2014 11:13 PM, "Kleinwächter, Wolfgang" wrote:
>>> FYI
>>>
>>>
>>> http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/features/smartbuy/tech-news/india-may-dilute-stand-on-net-control/article6524088.ece
>>
>> Hi Wolfgang
>>
>
> <Snip>
>
>> Everyone agrees that technical and day to day administration should be done
>> by MS systems, within higher public policy principles that should be
>> administered in a arms length manner with clearly laid out process.
> India didn't believe that when they put their original proposal forward at PP14!

India asked for laying public policy principles for management of 
addressing resource in collaboration with other concerned stakeholders 
and organisations. It did not comment on who should undertake 'technical 
and day to day administration'. My views on the proposal were sent to 
this list a while ago... I do not agree with all the proposed directions 
in which principles were sought to be developed.


>
> It called for a major re-engineering in day to day operations of
> internetworking.
>
>


-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t