[governance] PP: India wants to abolish BGP and introduce national routing and IP management
McTim
dogwallah at gmail.com
Sat Nov 1 18:54:31 EDT 2014
On Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 2:29 PM, Barry Shein <bzs at world.std.com> wrote:
<snip>
> I was just referring to the fact that the RIRs are defined as
> representing a set of nation states.
I don't think that is a fact in evidence at all.
RIRs can "represent" their Members, certainly. In international fora
such as the ITU, I think RIRs "represent" their policy communities and
their Membership.
I don't think they purport to represent anyone else, certainly not nation states
One doesn't have to live in a region to participate in the policy
making of that regions RIR.
Entities can be HQed outside the geo region that makes up a RIR and
still get resources from that RIR. So a US CDN can get RIPE resources
or a Indian Tier 1 can get resources from the ARIN region, etc.
--
Cheers,
McTim
"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A
route indicates how we get there." Jon Postel
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
For all other list information and functions, see:
http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
http://www.igcaucus.org/
Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
More information about the Governance
mailing list