[governance] Mechanisms for ending mass surveillance (was Re: NTIA announcment)

[Norbert Bollow]

Anriette Esterhuysen <anriette at apc.org> wrote:

> With this transition on the table we can go into the 'future
> evolution' into more detail, but what about coming up with
> mechanisms for addressing mass surveillance?

I would conjecture that quite a few actions of recent months, including
the NTIA announcement, have been driven to a significant extent by a
desire of US actors to fill the 'future evolution' discourse as much as
possible with content that is unrelated to the mass surveillance issue.

Who is interested in collaborating on developing a counter-strategy to
this?

I mean, I'm looking for a strategic collaboration aimed at keeping the
mass surveillance issue as part of the center of the discourse, as an
important human rights concern that needs to be part of what the
Internet governance ecosystem needs to be engineered to effectively
address.

Greetings,
Norbert

-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t