[governance] Finding IGC voice... again, on NETMundial and beyond.

Mon Mar 3 05:25:15 EST 2014

Very important. +1 to Louis proposal.

Sonigitu Ekpe

Mobile +234 805 0232 469    Office + 234 802 751 0179
 "LIFE is all about love and thanksgiving"

On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 12:58 AM, Ian Peter <ian.peter at ianpeter.com> wrote:

>   Hi Mawaki
>
> I think it would be great if IGC could make some sort of submission for
> NetMundial, but with a March 8 deadline and a preceding consensus call it
> may prove difficult
>
> I would leave my proposal re IANA out of it because I know many here have
> different opinions (some slight, some major) and I dont think a consensus
> statement could be achieved. So perhaps we should concentrate on Louis's
> list of principles, ie
>
>
> 1 - On-line users must enjoy the same human rights as they do off-line.
>
> 2- There must not be discrimination in access and contents due to criteria
> such as opinion, religion, race, gender, geography, language, or economic
> resources.
>
> 3- Services offered in the internet must remain equitable and neutral
> among service providers, without taking unfair advantage of a dominant or
> privileged position.
>
> 4- Internet availability, deployment, and service conditions must benefit
> all segments of the human society, not just those enjoying richer economic
> development.
>
> 5- A special effort must be engaged in order to provide the Less Developed
> Countries with an equitable share of resources to participate in activities
> related to worldwide internet governance.
>
> I would immediately agree to these - and I know Louis mentioned this was
> being worked on for a NetMundial submission - Louis, if you would like to,
> and could put forward a final draft by say COB Tuesday, I think that would
> allow time for consensus adoption and submission, or for IGC to be a
> co-signatory?
>
>
> Ian Peter
>
>  *From:* Mawaki Chango <kichango at gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Monday, March 03, 2014 7:55 AM
> *To:* Internet Governance <governance at lists.igcaucus.org> ; Deirdre
> Williams <williams.deirdre at gmail.com>
> *Subject:* [governance] Finding IGC voice... again, on NETMundial and
> beyond.
>
>  Dear All,
>
> First of all, I wish to apologize on behalf of Deirdre and myself for the
> prolonged silence. We both have been caught at the same time in other
> immediate commitments with various demands on our time, including traveling
> and the burdens that come with (starting with the reason why one might be
> traveling in the first place which can only be carried out during the
> limited time of such travels.) Anyway, you get my drift...
>
> Now I'd like to get the ball rolling on things that we as IGC might want
> to do this year by building on those who have already posted ideas and
> suggestions regarding the NetMundial at São Paulo. While it may be late
> for starting to prepare a written submission which is expected to be in by
> March 8, perhaps we may still start working out something that could be
> delivered during the proceedings if we are given the opportunity (or simply
> as a first step in the formulation of some basic ideas we might seek
> consensus on at some point in the process in response to Ig challenges of
> the day, even beyond São Paulo.)
>
> On that note, I remember Antonio Medina Gómez sending to the list a note
> dated Jan 22 where he volunteered "to attend the meeting and act as
> Rapporteur for the IGC to report back on meetings in real time. Let me know
> what your thoughts are. I will also update you daily and at the end of the
> meeting produce a report on key observations. I think having a team of IGC
> rapporteurs would be useful and I am willing to volunteer."
>
> So maybe beyond written submissions, the question that looms ahead is: How
> are we going to organize IGC presence and participation in the proceedings
> in São Paulo?
>
> Meanwhile and for immediate consideration, I have seen over the recent
> days two proposals/statements that appear to me a good starting point for
> discussing any possible input by IGC or subsets/member of IGC. One is more
> about principles and the other more focused on a practical solution to one
> problem. I have copied and pasted them as follows.
>
> [SOURCE: Louis Pouzin, mail posted on Feb 28]
>
> 1 - On-line users must enjoy the same human rights as they do off-line.
>
> 2- There must not be discrimination in access and contents due to criteria
> such as opinion, religion, race, gender, geography, language, or economic
> resources.
>
> 3- Services offered in the internet must remain equitable and neutral
> among service providers, without taking unfair advantage of a dominant or
> privileged position.
>
> 4- Internet availability, deployment, and service conditions must benefit
> all segments of the human society, not just those enjoying richer economic
> development.
>
> 5- A special effort must be engaged in order to provide the Less Developed
> Countries with an equitable share of resources to participate in activities
> related to worldwide internet governance.
>
> [SOURCE: Ian Peter, mail posted on Feb 28]
>
> Roadmap (and principles) for internalisation of the former  IANA functions
> within the multistakeholder ICANN model.
>
> This roadmap concentrates on one internet governance issue only - the
> future of the IANA functions which have been the subject of much past
> discussion because current arrangements are seen by many to be outside of
> the preferred multistakeholder model.
>
> Indeed, IANA itself was established  in an era before current internet
> governance models (multistakeholder) and governance institutions (eg ICANN)
> were in existence.
>
> ROADMAP
>
> This roadmap suggests that the IANA functions, though necessary processes
> in the secure and authoritative functioning of the Internet, no longer need
> a separate entity and would more productively merged with similar functions
> under the auspices of ICANN. Subject of course to many concerns about
> details, this direction appears to have widespread support from
> governments, civil society, technical community, and private sector.
>
> In order to achieve this desired change efficiently and productively, the
> following roadmap is proposed.
>
> 1.       ICANN should be requested to prepare a proposal for management of
> the previous IANA functions within the ICANN multistakeholder model,
> bearing in mind the following criteria:
>
> (a) protection of the root zone from political or other improper
> interference;
>
> (b) integrity, stability, continuity, security and robustness of the
> administration of the root zone;
>
> (c) widespread [international] trust by Internet users in the
> administration of this function; (d) support of a single unified root zone;
> and
>
> (e) agreement regarding an accountability mechanism for this function that
> is broadly accepted as being in the global public interest."
>
> 2. Preparation of the proposal should involve discussion with all major
> stakeholder groups, with a completion timetable for a first draft for
> discussion at the Internet Governance Forum in Turkey in September 2014.
>
> 3. To expedite completion in a timely manner, it is suggested that outside
> consultants be engaged to prepare the discussion paper (proposal) in
> consultation with major stakeholders.
>
> 4. The solution must have the following characteristics
>
> (a) offers a legal structure that is robust against rogue litigation
> attacks
>
> (b) is aligned with the Internet technical infrastructure in a way that
> supports innovative, technology based evolution of the DNS .
>
> (c) is an inclusive model
>
> (d) is a demonstrable improvement on current processes in this area
>
> END of proposals
>
> Deirdre also has suggested the possibility of a series of very short
> statements (micro-blogging kind of length) to capture succinct positions on
> critical points. She will probably say more on that in the next couple of
> days.
>
> Meanwhile I am inviting you all to step forward and share your thought
> about the above.
>
> Thank you.
>
>   Mawaki
>
>
> ------------------------------
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>      governance at lists.igcaucus.org
> To be removed from the list, visit:
>      http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
>
> For all other list information and functions, see:
>      http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
>      http://www.igcaucus.org/
>
> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>      governance at lists.igcaucus.org
> To be removed from the list, visit:
>      http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
>
> For all other list information and functions, see:
>      http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
>      http://www.igcaucus.org/
>
> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20140303/d833ada5/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t