[governance] Re: [discuss] Some more legal tangles for ICANN

[parminder]

Many of us have been saying for years now that ICANN as a global 
governance body is simply not sustainable to remain under US 
jurisdiction, and must be incorporated under international law with host 
country immunities.... And we have said a thousand times that it is not 
just the issue of what the US executive decides, but also what any court 
in US could decide any day on any issue, which could unravel the whole 
structure and its plausibility.... Sorry for the 'I told you so' 
sentiment, but well, we need to wake up. Even now.... parminder


On Friday 27 June 2014 02:54 PM, Bill Woodcock wrote:
> On Jun 27, 2014, at 2:22 AM, michael gurstein <gurstein at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> http://www.timesofisrael.com/israeli-us-terror-victims-now-own-irans-internet/
> For those not following on NANOG:
>
> http://freebeacon.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/Subpoena-Ben-Haim-02-1611-with-Schedule-A.pdf
>
>                                  -Bill
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> discuss mailing list
> discuss at 1net.org
> http://1net-mail.1net.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20140627/e8e198ea/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t