[governance] [bestbits] NetMundial Alliance

William Drake wjdrake at gmail.com
Thu Jun 26 06:32:16 EDT 2014


Hi

Thanks Ephraim.  These points have also been lightly touched on in the high level panel report and NM outcome doc, and will be explored more in a project being prepared for Istanbul.

Best,

Bill

On Jun 26, 2014, at 11:25 AM, Ephraim Percy Kenyanito <ekenyanito at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello Nnena and all,
> 
> Here is a blog by Fadi about it: http://blog.icann.org/2014/05/turning-talk-into-action-after-netmundial/
> 
> Quote from Fadi's blog in this paragraph, "I am personally ready to work tirelessly on coalescing governments, private sector and civil society to operationalize the NETmundial roadmap. An alliance or a coalition, fueled by the unforgettable spirit of NETmundial, and united by its principles, should without delay focus on the practical implementation of the NETmundial roadmap elements, specifically:
> Enable innovative and practical mechanisms to map Internet Governance issues to existing solutions. Where no solution is available, the mechanisms should dynamically fuse institutions and experts to address the issue effectively with participation from all stakeholders.
> Support the establishment of national Internet governance structures, enabling collaboration between government, private sector, and civil society members to produce local policy models/recommendations and best practices.
> Empower participants from governments, private sector and civil society -especially in developing regions – to actively engage in the distributed Internet governance ecosystem. The empowerment should come in the form of effective training, tools, and ready access to expertise.
> As I commented during one of the sessions at NETmundial, there is something in the Brazilian or Latin American wind that energized our discussions here over two days. Participants talked about the pervasive spirit of cooperation and collaboration – a willingness to listen to one another’s points of views and to try to find common ground. I hope that spirit continues in the months to come as we continue on this journey to evolved Internet governance together."
> 
> --
> 
> Best Regards,
> 
> ​​Ephraim Percy Kenyanito
> Website: http://about.me/ekenyanito
> 
> On 26 Jun 2014, at 10:26 AM, William Drake <wjdrake at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Hello from ICANN London
>> 
>> 
>> On Jun 25, 2014, at 3:05 AM, Joana Varon <joana at varonferraz.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> it would also be interesting to know the latest positions at the GAC about the transition process. Have anyone written anything about it? 
>> 
>>  the GAC Communiqué  is here:
>> 
>> https://gacweb.icann.org/download/attachments/27132037/GAC%20London%20Commu
>> nique%20FINAL%20.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1403767077808&api=v2
>> 
>>> 
>>> On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 7:33 PM, Nnenna Nwakanma <nnenna75 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hi people
>>> 
>>> Who was in the GAC/Board meeting today when ICANN President announced a "NetMundial Alliance" in London at ICANN50?
>> 
>> Fadi has been musing privately about this since at least September but the concept is still evolving, so the announcement now was an interesting decision.  NCUC had the US delegation visit our Tuesday meeting for an hour and when I asked about it, Larry Strickling said they were as surprised as anyone by the announcement and looking forward to hearing more.  A rep of another presumably relevant entity I asked said pretty much the same.  One that’s not here seems to know more, so probably the conversation is being evolved piecemeal.
>> 
>> Without wanting to put words in his mouth, basically Fadi seems to think that a new multistakeholder configuration of (what he sees as) key governments and nongovernmental actors is needed to carry forward the NETmundial agenda.  The argument has been put to him that such an effort would likely be more divisive than useful if it’s constructed on a selective rather than inclusive basis and is decoupled from other processes/forums than enjoy broad legitimacy.  Hopefully he’ll take these and related considerations on board going forward, guess we’ll see.
>> 
>> Best
>> 
>> Bill
>> 
>> 
>> ____________________________________________________________
>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>>     bestbits at lists.bestbits.net.
>> To unsubscribe or change your settings, visit:
>>     http://lists.bestbits.net/wws/info/bestbits

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20140626/c8439672/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t


More information about the Governance mailing list