CS consensual statement on MSism WAS Re: [governance] Vint Verf tells us the conclusion of the complex IANA transition process

[michael gurstein]

Hmmm... do cats announce their intentions to pigeons?

M

-----Original Message-----
From: governance-request at lists.igcaucus.org [mailto:governance-request at lists.igcaucus.org] On Behalf Of McTim
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2014 7:22 AM
To: governance at lists.igcaucus.org; Deirdre Williams
Cc: Mawaki Chango
Subject: Re: CS consensual statement on MSism WAS Re: [governance] Vint Verf tells us the conclusion of the complex IANA transition process

On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 8:14 AM, Deirdre Williams <williams.deirdre at gmail.com> wrote:

<snip>

> I would propose that a great part of the difficulty of definition is 
> caused by the word "stakeholder", because a stakeholder is seen as 
> being one with a tangible, concrete investment in a process.

I don't think that is the case at all.  I've never seen or heard anyone in IG make that kind of statement.


rgds,

McTim



-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t