[governance] Re: Root Server

[McTim]

Hi Stephane,



On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 11:41 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer
<bortzmeyer at internatif.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 06:43:20AM -0500,
>  McTim <dogwallah at gmail.com> wrote
>  a message of 72 lines which said:
>
>> so mathematically, we could have 20 rootops instead of 13 once all
>> rootops are v6 enabled.
>
> May I suggest that you read the very interesting Internet-Draft?
> Because you get it completely wrong (there is no limit on the number
> of "root name servers" in this proposal, read it).


I did read it, perhaps my interpretation is wrong:

"Then we get the following formula,

                        12+5+31+15*(N-1)+16*N+28*N<1232

       Accordingly, N=20, which means that the root servers can only be
       increased by 7 more in the IPv6 transport environment (without EDNS0
       [8] and TCP supporting)."


What did I miss?

-- 
Cheers,

McTim
"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A
route indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel

-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t