[governance] Root Server

[McTim]

so mathematically, we could have 20 rootops instead of 13 once all
rootops are v6 enabled.

I'm sure there are 7 more orgs who would be willing to pony up several
hundred thousand USD per year to take on the responsibility of running
a rootserver, including some governments.

The question in my mind is "would those governments be willing to
serve the root without censorship?"

So India for example might be willing to pay, but would they be keen
to serve a root with .tata or .hindu in it?


On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 4:03 AM, "Kleinwächter, Wolfgang"
<wolfgang.kleinwaechter at medienkomm.uni-halle.de> wrote:
> FYI
>
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-lee-dnsop-scalingroot-00
>
> Wolfgang
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>      governance at lists.igcaucus.org
> To be removed from the list, visit:
>      http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
>
> For all other list information and functions, see:
>      http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
>      http://www.igcaucus.org/
>
> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>



-- 
Cheers,

McTim
"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A
route indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel

-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t