[NCUC-DISCUSS] [bestbits] Re: [governance] list of important questions to be delivered to LOC before 27th meeting

[Nnenna Nwakanma]

I will tend to lean on a committee using an agreed set of criteria, one
being contribution during the prep process.
However, there is one thing that needs to be checked
** the size of government delegations***

How many people can be in an official delegation?

Over the years, the IGF has been encouraging governments to add CS folks to
their delegations, and not  many countries have been doing that. So the
question here will be : "What will be the maximum size of an official
delegation?"

N


On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 3:35 PM, Marilia Maciel <mariliamaciel at gmail.com>wrote:

> Thanks for that Norbert. And if anyone feels that there were older threads
> in our lists that were important to this present discussion, please link
> them here, or resend them. I am trying to map, but any help would be useful.
> Best
> Marília
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Norbert Bollow <nb at bollow.ch> wrote:
>
>> Marilia Maciel <mariliamaciel at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Next step would be the question of selection. So far I have informally
>> > tried to reach out to people and ask opinions. What I have collected
>> > so far comes down to three options. But there may be more, so please
>> > propose new ideas or comment on the ones below:
>> >
>> > - Bottom up self-selection process. Pro: more legitimacy. Con: some
>> > fear the burden would be too heavy for a nom-com.
>> > - First come first served. People who register would be accepted
>> > until the number of participants is reached. Pro: easier to handle.
>> > Con: some fear it could create distortions and lack of balance
>> > - Selection by a committee (not clear by which one), based on
>> > previously agreed criteria such as: balance between developind and
>> > developed regions, presenting contributions to the public
>> > consultation as pre-condition for on site participation, have
>> > attended at least 3 IGFs, etc. Pro: Middle-terms solution if criteria
>> > is agreed beforehand. Con: Not mentioned.
>> >
>> > Please, let me know if you have feelings or preferences about the
>> > above.
>>
>> APC has proposed that the selection of participants should be on the
>> basis of contributing substantively during the preparatory process.
>>
>> I support that proposal.
>>
>> Greetings,
>> Norbert
>>
>
>
>
> --
> *Marília Maciel*
> Pesquisadora Gestora
> Centro de Tecnologia e Sociedade - FGV Direito Rio
>
> Researcher and Coordinator
> Center for Technology & Society - FGV Law School
> http://direitorio.fgv.br/cts
>
> DiploFoundation associate
> www.diplomacy.edu
>
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>      bestbits at lists.bestbits.net.
> To unsubscribe or change your settings, visit:
>      http://lists.bestbits.net/wws/info/bestbits
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20140126/6d477521/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t