[governance] Substantive discourse processes for the Brazil MSM (was Re: Meeting ... between the LOG and 1Net)

Richard Hill rhill at hill-a.ch
Sun Jan 26 08:54:04 EST 2014


I will be pleased to co-sign it.

Best,
Richard

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Norbert Bollow [mailto:nb at bollow.ch]
> Sent: dimanche, 26. janvier 2014 09:30
> To: governance at lists.igcaucus.org; Richard Hill
> Cc: Daniel IGA MWESIGWA; Birgitta Jónsdóttir
> Subject: Re: [governance] Substantive discourse processes for the Brazil
> MSM (was Re: Meeting ... between the LOG and 1Net)
> 
> 
> Many thanks to Richard for his comments on the questions that I had
> raised.
> 
> I've added two notes at the end which are inspired by Richard's
> response (see below).
> 
> I had hoped that there would be significant discussion, and on the
> basis of that, a consensus process on this submission. It is not a
> problem from my perspective however to provide this input as an
> individual submission. Alternatively, if someone is interested in
> co-signing this, please let me know by tonight 23.00 UTC.
> 
> Greetings,
> Norbert
> 
> --snip-------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Submission on substantive discourse processes
> 
> This document aims to propose a set of broadly acceptable processes
> for handling substantive inputs to the Global Multistakeholder
> Meeting on the Future of Internet Governance.
> 
> According to the website http://brmeeting.br/ the meeting will “focus
> on crafting Internet governance principles and proposing a roadmap for
> the further evolution of the Internet governance ecosystem.”
> 
> Since the time for substantive preparatory processes is so short, it
> may be appropriate to further focus the planned meeting on gathering
> requirements and concerns in regard to Internet governance principles
> and the further evolution of the Internet governance ecosystem, from
> various perspectives, and to build a shared understanding of what the
> various perspectives on this are.
> 
> If this objective is adopted, appropriate processes for handling
> substantive inputs could include the following:
> 
>  *  Communicate (as early as possible) an invitation to provide input
>     documents on gathering requirements and concerns, from various
>     perspectives.
> 
>  *  Assemble a working group tasked with compiling these substantive
>     inputs into a comprehensive report.
> 
>  *  After March 1, the deadline for submitting substantive
>     contributions. The working group will draft a report on
>     requirements and concerns, noting which points require further
>     clarification.
> 
>  *  Each contributor is given the opportunity to double-check that
>     their contribution is reflected appropriately.
> 
>  *  Requests for changes / corrections which contributors have
>     submitted are processed.
> 
>  *  The working group for the substantive report tries to identify
>     what are the open points that need to be resolved before the report
>     can be adopted as describing a shared understanding of what the
>     various perspectives on this are.
> 
>  *  At the beginning of the MSM itself, the list of “open points that
>     need to be resolved” can be added to by any participant.
> 
>  *  The rest of the first day of the MSM is used for breakout sessions
>     attempting to achieve consensus resolutions for the various open
>     points.
> 
>  *  The second day is used for plenary sessions in which resolution
>     proposals are presented and hopefully consensus is achieved.
> 
> Notes:
> 
> 1. In terms of style requirements on the submissions, a necessary
> and maybe sufficient rule is that ad hominem attacks, insults, etc.
> must not be allowed.
> 
> 2. The fundamental model for developing the output document would be
> the "single text" approach: there is one document, and anybody is
> free to propose changes to it.  The changes are discussed and agreed
> or not. The starting point for this process is an empty document.
> 
> 
> Respectfully submitted
> with all the best wishes
> 
> Norbert Bollow, Swiss Open Systems User Group
> 
> 


-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t


More information about the Governance mailing list