[governance] netmundial 0.1
Izumi AIZU
aizu at anr.org
Sat Apr 26 18:28:29 EDT 2014
Thank you Stephanie and Adam for your clarifications.
I still have the "impression" that the last session was not quite as open
as it could be.
Firstly, there was not announcement, or explanation, as to how the final
document would be dealt by HLMC in advance, or even on the fly, for those
who were in the Main Room.
Yes, it would be much better to have live streaming and scribed texts
online for those who were not in the small drafting room.
I would say even in the small room, it was VERY difficult to figure out
what exactly they are discussing unless you have good hearing ability and
understanding of the English since they were not using the microphone and
sometimes audiences making some noise.
It was semi transparent in my view.
I do not mean for criticism, but for lessons going forward.
More than 10 years ago, we had WSIS prep meeting in Tokyo and we insisted
that Drafting session by governments plus civil society and private sector
be open to all who want to participate. It worked well. We had big screen
in front of all, and everyone could speak up once chair allow, there were
some distinction between the official member of the drafting committee and
others, but not much, In the end the result of this informal drafting
committee was sent to the government only negotiation, which was open and
transparent, but no-government stakeholders including IGOs could have no
say.
We asked government people to "honor" the works of this multistakeholder
draft document and in my view we got 85%, if not 90%. (could not get good
language for Human rights and Freedom of Expression).
Now, after more than 10 years, we have, as I wrote, better online tool,
much better working experience among CS members with other stakeholders,
better recognition on CS and MSH to advance our work.
As Jeanette and Ian point out, we could have done better if we had better
prepared and also better prepared on the fly.
But overall, I think civil society did a very good job, together with
Brazilian host, but also I like to mention the other stakeholders,
governments, business, tech and academic community also deserve the
recognition together,
As we were discussing during the dinner right after the closure, we could
and should understand some government folks who really had constraints
under their mandate, therefore had to put their reservations on the record.
And even so, I think their behaviors were not that disruptive, at the last
stage, to honor Brazilian host and also all of us engaged there.
izumi
2014-04-27 2:30 GMT+09:00 Adam Peake <ajp at glocom.ac.jp>:
> The last meeting of the HLMC was open to observers. But it was a shame we
> didn't think to put cameras and mics in the room for the drafting sessions
> so they could have been webcast. Just that it wasn't thought of at the
> time.
>
> Adam
>
>
>
>
> On Apr 27, 2014, at 12:33 AM, Stephanie Perrin wrote:
>
> > Unfortunately that process was not open, and perhaps for good reason.
> They also realize they made an error in the last minute rush, and put the
> wrong older text in for one clause. Business is actually arguing to put a
> better one for us back in. Will let the list know if it happens.
> > Despite the hairiness of this process, I think folks should remember
> that there was a remarkable production of good will achieved by all the
> open drafting sessions….this is really an unusual way to do business. Rome
> wasn’t built in a day…
> > Stephanie Perrin
> > Cheers stephanie
> > On Apr 25, 2014, at 2:38 PM, Izumi AIZU <aizu at anr.org> wrote:
> >
> >> First, Thanks to ALL who made this impossible possible.
> >>
> >> I was wondering during the last hours of confusion about the
> last-minute change, as well as sort of HLMC overriding the preceding
> process.
> >>
> >> My question 1 was, was this finalizing the Outcome document open to
> observers?
> >> (I still don't know and appreciate if someone teach me).
> >>
> >> I was wondering, and also now like to propose in the future similar
> event, to use the
> >> online tool, I mean online Notepad.
> >>
> >> In addition to the real-time scribes, and using projectors to put the
> text on the screen,
> >> it will be very effective to use the online notepad (such as Google Doc
> or something similar), over the Internet, as we draft. Everyone online can
> see the process of changing
> >> the words or sentences, they can keep track of all the changes.
> >>
> >> It will be useful for all the remote participants, or those in
> different rooms of the same
> >> venue while small number of drafting committee people do the work, that
> make it transparent.
> >>
> >> Just a suggestion.
> >>
> >> izumi
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> 2014-04-26 2:30 GMT+09:00 Ian Peter <ian.peter at ianpeter.com>:
> >> and I should have added – thanks too to the BestBits people for a
> really constructive pre conference get together. Without that we could not
> have worked together so well at the main event.
> >>
> >> From: Ian Peter
> >> Sent: Friday, April 25, 2014 11:17 PM
> >> To: governance at lists.igcaucus.org ; bestbits at lists.bestbits.net
> >> Subject: [governance] netmundial 0.1
> >>
> >> The conference is now over, and many of us now go into travel and long
> flights. But before I do, I want to say that during this conference, and
> the meeting beforehand, civil society people really worked incredibly well
> together – far more so than other constituencies. It was great to work with
> a group of such talented and knowledgeable people. There was a high volume
> of exchange and consultation between people and speakers on our behalf,
> with a willingness to take on other perspectives from the group, to stand
> down to allow a more relevant speaker to address a subject etc. great team
> work.
> >>
> >> As regards the results – this was version 0.1 of this very interesting
> – and i think promising – version of multistakeholder consultation. So like
> all versions 0.1, it was full of bugs and there are a few changes that
> should be made and improvements. I might say a thing or two about that
> after I have cleared my head. So I think the process has some lessons for
> us, and is worth repeating.
> >>
> >> As regards the outputs – as the civil society statement said, there
> were areas of disappointment. I would say personally that I was very angry
> at last minute changes made to some sections after the formal processes of
> drafting and consolidating text had ended and passed through those
> committees to the final approval stage. This was an example of some
> governmental players being more equal than others. As one colleague said,
> more like imperialism than multistakeholderism, from a party who preaches
> the religion. Oh well. In time I might say more about the detail of that.
> >>
> >> But for now – there was much good as well, and it was fantastic to be
> involved in this with such a great group of people. All our Brazilian reps,
> and also our selected reps on various committees, did a fantastic job – ad
> it was privilege to see how well they did. They worked long and hard on our
> behalf and deserve a lot of praise. If I start names I will miss someone,
> but to everyone who represented us, I must say job extremely well done.
> >>
> >> Now to wind down after three days of intense activities. Great work
> everyone, really worthwhile event.
> >>
> >> Ian Peter
> >>
> >> ____________________________________________________________
> >> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
> >> governance at lists.igcaucus.org
> >> To be removed from the list, visit:
> >> http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
> >>
> >> For all other list information and functions, see:
> >> http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
> >> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
> >> http://www.igcaucus.org/
> >>
> >> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
> >>
> >>
> >> ____________________________________________________________
> >> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
> >> governance at lists.igcaucus.org
> >> To be removed from the list, visit:
> >> http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
> >>
> >> For all other list information and functions, see:
> >> http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
> >> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
> >> http://www.igcaucus.org/
> >>
> >> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> >> Izumi Aizu <<
> >>
> >> Institute for InfoSocionomics, Tama University, Tokyo
> >>
> >> Institute for HyperNetwork Society, Oita,
> >> Japan
> >> * * * * *
> >> << Writing the Future of the History >>
> >> www.anr.org
> >> ____________________________________________________________
> >> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
> >> governance at lists.igcaucus.org
> >> To be removed from the list, visit:
> >> http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
> >>
> >> For all other list information and functions, see:
> >> http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
> >> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
> >> http://www.igcaucus.org/
> >>
> >> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
> >
> > ____________________________________________________________
> > You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
> > governance at lists.igcaucus.org
> > To be removed from the list, visit:
> > http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
> >
> > For all other list information and functions, see:
> > http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
> > To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
> > http://www.igcaucus.org/
> >
> > Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>
>
--
>> Izumi Aizu <<
Institute for InfoSocionomics, Tama University, Tokyo
Institute for HyperNetwork Society, Oita,
Japan
* * * * *
<< Writing the Future of the History >>
www.anr.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20140427/65b02f02/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
For all other list information and functions, see:
http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
http://www.igcaucus.org/
Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
More information about the Governance
mailing list