[First draft] Letter to Pres. Rousseff Re: [bestbits] [governance] Dilma Rousseff's speech at UN

[Joana Varon]

Dear Avri et all,

By now the letter looks like this:

https://pad.riseup.net/p/IGC-Supports-Brazil

Please, bring your inputs to make it sound more international.

We haven't set a time frame to close the drafting and start to collect
endorsements, but there is this opportunity that Carlos Afonso has
mentioned to deliver it in person (Carlos,please, allow me to quote you
again within these two lists):

"It would be *extremely important* to have it *ready by tomorrow late night
*(it can be very late in the night -- I am not really sleeping these
days)*Brazilian time
* so I can print it and try and deliver it to the Presidenta's hands (or
her closest advisors)." (wrote 7 hours ago).

Depending on what you think about this current draft, it might be feasible
to have endorsements by tomorrow night.

Let's try to close the drafting process tomorrow at 09:00am (Brazilian
time) and have the whole afternoon to collect signatures within
Europe/Asia/Africa and the day to do so within the Americas?

Sorry for the rush. I'm just trying to follow all the suggestions received
in different threads as coherently as possible.

best

joana



On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 9:27 PM, Avri Doria <avri at acm.org> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> While I cannot accept any plan that is dominated by States and their
> multilateral closed club, I don't think that the letter necessarily must be
> read that way.
>
> She does say:
>
> > 2 - Open, multilateral and democratic governance, carried out with
> transparency by stimulating
> > collective creativity and the participation of society, Governments and
> the private sector.
>
> And while this is not quite yet an endorsement of the fully participatory
> democracy I hope MSism leads to, it does seem to aim that way.
>
> Yes, is it still top down, as the governments will be stimulating the
> people as opposed to the people simulating the government, but there are
> other sentiments that do warrant support.
>
> As long as civil society does not bind itself to government leadership by
> buying into a multilateral vision, I suppose it is possible to come up with
> something that could get some sort of support.
>
> But in one day as Carlos asks?
>
> avri
>
>
>
>
> On 25 Sep 2013, at 13:04, McTim wrote:
>
> > <cc list trimmed>
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 12:45 PM, michael gurstein <gurstein at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> The Brazil statement is I think, an excellent including the references
> in
> >> the context of governance to MLism rather than to MSism given the
> ambiguity
> >> and bad faith which can be ascribed to many of the particular uses (and
> >> users) of the latter terminology/methodology.
> >>
> >> The multilateral system has earned its spurs if nothing else through the
> >> UNDHR and the work of such agencies as the WHO and UNICEF and in their
> times
> >> the UNDP and UNESCO.
> >>
> >> The quite evidently subverted MSism of the Internet may by my reckoning
> at
> >> this moment be something of a poisoned challice (if nothing else
> through the
> >> potentially questionable motives (and ideologies) of its most ardent
> >> governmental and other backers) and we await its redemption through the
> >> (possible) mounting of a suitable response post-Snowden.
> >
> > MSism needs no "redemption".  Just because one supporter of it got
> > caught doing dodgy things does not somehow tar the entire structure of
> > Internet policy making that has been built over decades.
> >
> > I for one would object quite strongly to the Caucus supporting MLism
> > over MSism.  I think it was a fine speech but if we are going to write
> > a letter of support, we should note that we have always supported
> > MSism.
> >
> > If you want a global treaty to stop governments from spying on
> > everything we do online, I think it foolish to leave it in the hands
> > of governments only!
> >
> > --
> > Cheers,
> >
> > McTim
> > "A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A
> > route indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel
> >
> > ____________________________________________________________
> > You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
> >     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
> > To be removed from the list, visit:
> >     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
> >
> > For all other list information and functions, see:
> >     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
> > To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
> >     http://www.igcaucus.org/
> >
> > Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>      governance at lists.igcaucus.org
> To be removed from the list, visit:
>      http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
>
> For all other list information and functions, see:
>      http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
>      http://www.igcaucus.org/
>
> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>
>


-- 
-- 

Joana Varon Ferraz
@joana_varon
PGP 0x016B8E73
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20130926/89ff6085/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t