Who is Civil Society?/ Re: [governance] stakeholder categories (was Re: NSA sabotage of Internet security standards...)

[Suresh Ramasubramanian]

If there is a valid contribution from any group of people or organizations, 
that is viable from a technical and/or policy standpoint, and it gets 
ignored, and the consequences of that ignoring then become apparent, well, 
we can always say 'told you so'

And then make common cause with those stakeholders across stakeholder 
groups (amorphous though that tern is) who are then willing to achieve 
consensus with us

--srs (htc one x)



On 19 September 2013 2:08:01 AM JFC Morfin <jefsey at jefsey.com> wrote:
> At 22:17 18/09/2013, Ian Peter wrote:
> >Multistakeholder governance? Sorry, it makes no sense to me, and is 
> greatly open to manipulation and domination by the powerful.
>
> Ian,
> This is fully correct. And this is what pays the T&Ls. This is why you/we 
> have to become powerful your/ourself. There are different ways of becoming 
> powerful but all them ressort to make your/ourself necessary or feared. 
> You/we will never achieve this is just complaining or chatting as Civil 
> Society only does. What is the impact on the other stakeholders if they 
> just to ignore us?
> jfc
>
>
>



-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t