[governance] US's oversight role

[Suresh Ramasubramanian]

Yes. But they have to be informed by closely tracking the process.

Blanket criticism of a process, of the "all senators are thieves" variety  I can get if I walk into a bar

--srs (iPad)

On 06-Sep-2013, at 23:07, David Allen <David_Allen_AB63 at post.harvard.edu> wrote:

> On Sep 6, 2013, at 3:26 AM, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> 
>> ...  I would have thought you would need to actively participate in any process at all, to understand it to any significant degree.
> 
> Or, one can get caustic appraisals, from those at the very center.  Has happened.  With indubitable, damning evidence.
> 
> There _are_ alternatives, to participation.
> 
> David
> 
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
> To be removed from the list, visit:
>     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
> 
> For all other list information and functions, see:
>     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
>     http://www.igcaucus.org/
> 
> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t

-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t