[governance] US's oversight role

[Suresh Ramasubramanian]

Yes thank you, I dont need to google for what you asked me to.

I will maintain that change if any has to come from within, and from participating in the process.

--srs (iPad)

On 06-Sep-2013, at 20:10, JFC Morfin <jefsey at jefsey.com> wrote:

> At 12:52 06/09/2013, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
>> And not trusting the icann process makes a mockery of the stakeholders that do trust it, participate in it and hope to influence change from within .. which includes many people on this caucus
> 
> Dear Suresh,
> 
> I am very sorry, but trusting the ICANN process is by itself a mockery. In particular of all the informed stakeholders who have suffered  from it for 15 years. These informed stakeholders, as you mention it, know that the ICANN process needs change, from within, from outside or the internet being without it.
> 
> If you wish - I have organized several votes of icannatlarge and IDNO - I could send you more than 2000 email addresses of people who distrustsed the ICANN process and wanted to positively influence its change from within.
> 
> I have been on the DNHC, I own the atlarge.org domain name, I have been a France candidate to the ICANN BoD, then a GNSO candidate. I just looked in my mail archive searching for the word ICANN : it came back with 51173 mails over 13 years.
> 
> Cheers :-) !!!
> jfc
> 
> 
> 
> 

-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t