[governance] Stakeholder group distinctions (was Re: Ad hoc...)

[Cheryl Langdon-Orr]

Missed this while travelling  but I want to give me total support to what
 Wolfgang (and others) are saying here... It resonates perfectly with my
approach of "being at the discussion table to be able to influence and make
change" approach...

*Cheryl Langdon-Orr ...  **(CLO)*
 http://about.me/cheryl.LangdonOrr


On 26 October 2013 11:22, "Kleinwächter, Wolfgang" <
wolfgang.kleinwaechter at medienkomm.uni-halle.de> wrote:

> Being located in different baskets does not mean that you have not a lot
> of things in common. As I said in a previous mail, CS has to start from its
> basic values and interests. From this point we have to identify the spaces
> for close cooperation with other stakeholders, including PS and TC. In this
> process we will discover also the differences (as recently in the Bali
> discussion around the proposed Brazil meeting)which does not exclude a
> close collaboration where we can work together. Building bridges is better
> than building walls.
>
> wolfgang
>
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: governance-request at lists.igcaucus.org im Auftrag von Norbert Bollow
> Gesendet: Sa 26.10.2013 03:47
> An: governance at lists.igcaucus.org
> Cc: Constance Bommelaer
> Betreff: [governance] Stakeholder group distinctions (was Re: Ad hoc...)
>
> David Cake <dave at difference.com.au> wrote:
>
> >       The 'Technical Community Role in Global Internet Governance'
> > workshop on Thursday made it fairly clear that the division between
> > technical community and civil society (or other stakeholder groups)
> > is a fairly artificial one, with many of us filling a variety of
> > different roles at different times
>
> What does this imply for processes such as the CSTD WG on Enhanced
> Cooperation where the selection of participants is based on this kind
> of stakeholder categories?
>
> If I've been hearing right what Constance Bommelaer, who was the tech
> community "focal point" for that selection process, has been telling
> me (I'm Cc'ing Constance in the hope that she'll correct me if I'm in
> any way misrepresenting this), the tech community's selection process
> has been based on the goal of selecting people who are somehow
> specifically representative of the particular kind of perspective that
> is characteristic of that community of techies and academics.
>
> Furthermore, they're working on a paper that will explain this and
> the underlying principles in significant clarity.
>
> I think that it will be very valuable for us in civil society to follow
> that example and undertake a similar clarification exercise in regard
> to our own identity as a community, etc.
>
> Greetings,
> Norbert
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>      governance at lists.igcaucus.org
> To be removed from the list, visit:
>      http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
>
> For all other list information and functions, see:
>      http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
>      http://www.igcaucus.org/
>
> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20131028/c4c551d6/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t