[governance] Re: [Fwd: Re: [bestbits] Sign-On Statement regarding the 2014 Internet Governance Summit in Brazil]

[Jeremy Malcolm]

On 26 Oct 2013, at 12:20 pm, parminder at itforchange.net wrote:

> In fact I am simply not sure who - as in which group - is leading this
> process - Jeremy, can we be clear on this...

The feeling on the Best Bits steering committee at our face to face meeting was that we should post it despite the lack of unanimity, and let those who wanted to sign on do so, however we never got the chance because the server went down.  That was when Norbert and Sala stepped in. Though not at our request. That isn't a really clear answer to your question, but it's the best I can do. 

> Also, why could IGC not go back to the process of consensus statement on
> the Brazil meeting which was postponed till more details become available
> and there is some f2f meetings in Bali.

Sure, why not? If consensus can be reached. 


-- 
Jeremy Malcolm PhD LLB (Hons) B Com
Internet and Open Source lawyer, consumer advocate, geek 
host -t NAPTR 5.9.8.5.2.8.2.2.1.0.6.e164.org|awk -F! '{print $3}'
WARNING: This email has not been encrypted. You are strongly recommended to enable PGP or S/MIME encryption at your end. For instructions, see http://jere.my/l/8m.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20131026/b5223065/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t