[governance] [bestbits] Rousseff & Chehade: Brazil will host world event on Internet governance in 2014

[Avri Doria]

Hi,


In a sense, good questions that could be asked of any group whether it was intergovernmental, industry, civil society or multistakeholder.  If you think a UN based group is going to don its blue helmets and go deal with these issues, just look at the threshold one needs to reach before the UN deal with situation were people who are being killed in the various genocidal 

Besides I do not think there are many here who want to go to war on this issues.

In another sense, I think these question might better be cast as issues for work to be done:  

How can these multistakeholder  organizations ...

And then we can spend our time on figuring out how do it.

I would contend that multistakeholder organizations bringing, as they might if they worked on these orphaned problems. all the capabilities of all stakeholders (including those IGOs) into play, have a better chance of finding peaceful solutions than the UN blue helmets.

avri


On 19 Oct 2013, at 04:17, Mishi Choudhary wrote:

> 
> 
> Question: Can this multi-stakeholder (whatever it is, as we are still discussing that) make rules that
> subject listeners to the rule of law at home, and prohibit the massive
> monitoring of other peoples' societies abroad?  
> 
> Question: Can this multi-stakeholder (organization/network) impose all ports,
> all services neutrality on network operators so corruptly in bed with
> governments around the world that no one knows how to tease out all
> the criminal connections?  
> 
> Question: Can this multi-stakeholder  decide whether
> "sharing services" are allowed to use monitoring technology that makes
> supposedly private sharing the material for "customized advertising"
> and "personal endorsement"?  Is fairness regulation in the economies
> of the world irrelevant to the future of the Net, or are
> "multi-stakeholder" organizations going to get more regulatory power
> than national governments are presently prepared to exercise on behalf
> of their citizens?
> 
> Question: How are these multi-stakeholder organizations planning to
> deal with governments that refuse to accept their decisions?  Is a
> future ICANN going to manufacture its own blue helmets, and send them
> into Saudi Arabia or China?
> 
> Conclusion: Isn't this really a bunch of statements from increasingly threatened current structures designed to make
> users of the Net think that somebody is looking out for their
> fundamental rights and collective economic interests, when in fact the
> spying, data-mining and pillaging is going to go smoothly on precisely
> as usual?
> 
> -
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 495 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20131019/47895380/attachment.sig>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t