[governance] "technical community fails at multistakeholderism". really?

[Raul Echeberria]

El 08/10/2013, a las 13:43, parminder escribió:

> 
> On Tuesday 08 October 2013 07:24 PM, John Curran wrote:
>> snip. 
>> 
>> The clear, uniform call by these organizations for globalization of ICANN and IANA 
>> a would call a truly substantial development.
> 
> Can you please point to where such a proposal/ call exists... Is there agreement on making ICANN an international organisation incorporated under international law and not US law, and free from all kinds of US jurisdiction, and in a host country agreement with the US government and so on.... That is what globalisation or internationalisation means..... I happy to support any such proposal from the technical community, and this can be basis of some real change. 
> 

I can respond from LACNIC. 
My answer is Yes. We support that ICANN become an international organization incorporated under a convenient jurisdiction. 
In that spirit we signed this historical declaration. 


Raúl 



-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t