[governance] more on Brazil-US stand off

Suresh Ramasubramanian suresh at hserus.net
Tue Oct 1 11:28:12 EDT 2013


Which is fair.  Either Louis Pouzin or Jefsey Morfin asked whether he would stand, and he declined.

[and i am sorry if my ipad sends it in this disgustingly large font - I don't know what happened to it all of a sudden, probably needs a reboot]

--srs (iPad)

> On 01-Oct-2013, at 20:49, "michael gurstein" <gurstein at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> No. 4--
> 
> I have specifically said that I wouldn't stand for co-co... 
> 
> M
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: McTim [mailto:dogwallah at gmail.com] 
> Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2013 7:54 AM
> To: michael gurstein
> Cc: governance at lists.igcaucus.org; Louis Pouzin (well); parminder;
> fredericknoronha at gmail.com
> Subject: Re: [governance] more on Brazil-US stand off
> 
> On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 10:30 AM, michael gurstein <gurstein at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> McTim,
>> 
>> Without attempting to pre-judge the actual meaning of the Bytes for 
>> All intervention that you have quoted it is quite clear from the 
>> article that you are quoting from that their concerns have to do with 
>> the specifics not of multialtatal `governance` but rather of national 
>> interventions into online expression
> 
> ?? that is not clear at all.
> 
> 
> (and notably that in Pakistan where Bytes is particularly
>> involved.
>> 
>> This I believe, is the third time in recent months that you have 
>> either deliberately or through lack of attention provided misleading 
>> information/quotation in this forum.
> 
> How is quoting the most specific relevant bit of an article
> "misquoting/misleading"?
> 
> 
> Notably in the other two instances no
>> apology or errata was forthcoming from you.
> 
> If you accuse Google of "monopolistic behavior" and I simply point out that
> in fact they are not a monopoly then we have a difference of opinion, which
> we are both entitled to.  We are not entitled to our own facts however.
> 
> I note that you have thrown your hat in the ring for the co-co role, if you
> are elected, will you be banning me from posting because I am not
> sufficiently anti-Google enough?
> 
> --
> McTim
> "A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A route
> indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel
> 
> 
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
> To be removed from the list, visit:
>     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
> 
> For all other list information and functions, see:
>     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
>     http://www.igcaucus.org/
> 
> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t

-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t


More information about the Governance mailing list