[governance] DMP} Statement on Process and Objectives for the Global Multistakeholder Meeting on the Future of Internet Governance
parminder
parminder at itforchange.net
Sat Nov 30 00:20:49 EST 2013
On Saturday 30 November 2013 10:38 AM, Rafik Dammak wrote:
> if the solely objective of internationalization of ICANN is just to
> change the location and giving it an kind of immunity ending to
> erode any accountability or transparency, yes we have problem.
No that is not the objective... The objective is to have means of
democratic oversight over some key resources that are a global commons...
> I am not arguing that should be an US org under US laws. how could
> you conclude that?
Because that is what Milton is arguing, and that is what it precisely
and fully means if ICANN is not to be converted from a US organisation
to an international non-gov organisation, unless of course you prefer it
changes into a international inter-gov organisation, which I am sure you
dont advocate... Can you point to the gap in this logical chain of 'my
conclusion',
And as you say if you are not arguing that ICANN "should be an US org
under US laws ", then the question is "what kind of org and under what
kind of law" do you advocate. Thanks.
parminder
> I have a question, maybe naive: if we have problem with one state to
> have dominant role as assumed by mant, how adding more states will
> solve the problem , a kind of zero sum game?
> another question, what benefit for the average users far from any
> geopolitical consideration in such case?
>
> Rafik
>
> 2013/11/30 parminder <parminder at itforchange.net
> <mailto:parminder at itforchange.net>>
>
>
> On Saturday 30 November 2013 10:19 AM, Rafik Dammak wrote:
>> yes Milton it will make it the FIFA of IG world
>>
>> Rafik
>
> Rafik, do you in that case agree that ICANN should remain an US
> organisation, subject solely to US laws... parminder
>
>>
>> 2013/11/30 Milton L Mueller <mueller at syr.edu
>> <mailto:mueller at syr.edu>>
>>
>> No, no, no, please. That level of specificity is
>> counterproductive at this stage. Many people who have studied
>> this issue believe that turning ICANN into an INGO is the
>> surest way for it to escape what little accountability it
>> currently has. Those willing to go along with a general call
>> for reform in ICANN’s US-centered oversight need not commit
>> themselves to a particular solution at this point, and the
>> language below does that.
>>
>> Please don’t come up with off the cuff quickie solutions for
>> this. It will take more than a scan of Wikipedia to solve.
>>
>> *From:*michael gurstein [mailto:gurstein at gmail.com
>> <mailto:gurstein at gmail.com>]
>> *Sent:* Friday, November 29, 2013 7:49 PM
>> *To:* governance at lists.igcaucus.org
>> <mailto:governance at lists.igcaucus.org>; 'Tracy F. Hackshaw @
>> Google'
>> *Cc:* 'Norbert Bollow'; Milton L Mueller
>> *Subject:* RE: [governance] DMP} Statement on Process and
>> Objectives for the Global Multistakeholder Meeting on the
>> Future of Internet Governance
>>
>> What about
>>
>> 1)Transitioning ICANN and IANA to an International
>> Non-Governmental Organization (INGO) status: The Global
>> Meeting should aim at developing a suitable and widely
>> acceptable means to achieve the desired transition of ICANN
>> and IANA away from its links to the USG and
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_nongovernmental_organization
>>
>> M
>>
>> *From:*governance-request at lists.igcaucus.org
>> <mailto:governance-request at lists.igcaucus.org>
>> [mailto:governance-request at lists.igcaucus.org] *On Behalf Of
>> *Tracy F. Hackshaw @ Google
>> *Sent:* Friday, November 29, 2013 2:39 PM
>> *To:* governance at lists.igcaucus.org
>> <mailto:governance at lists.igcaucus.org>
>> *Cc:* Norbert Bollow; Milton L Mueller
>> *Subject:* Re: [governance] DMP} Statement on Process and
>> Objectives for the Global Multistakeholder Meeting on the
>> Future of Internet Governance
>>
>> ICANN (and its President/CEO) have been "encouraged" at
>> several opportunities to adjust its "internationalization"
>> rhetoric/terminology and thus its resulting
>> INTERNATIONALIZATION thrust to one which is significantly
>> more embrasive of the objectives of, and indeed, spirit of
>> what GLOBALIZATION in theory, intends to achieve.
>>
>> I believe therefore that Milton's recommendation is timely
>> and appropriate ... whether we use the term "Globalization"
>> or a perhaps more compromising and less economics/free-market
>> linked phrase or term such as "Global Integration", or more
>> radically, "Glocalization".
>>
>> ------
>> Rgds,
>>
>> Tracy
>>
>> On Nov 29, 2013 4:52 PM, "Jean-Christophe NOTHIAS I The
>> Global Journal" <jc.nothias at theglobaljournal.net
>> <mailto:jc.nothias at theglobaljournal.net>> wrote:
>>
>> Dear Norbert, Dear Milton,
>>
>> If I may contribute, with a somehow different and unusual
>> perspective, and in my humble Global Governance
>> observer capacity, for the pleasure of the reflection:
>>
>> *Internationalization*: one wants to have a larger
>> international basis: more offices, more representatives, more
>> of a network of local branches that, being put together,
>> creates an international network. Still each element is
>> mostly comparable to the starting point in terms of culture,
>> thinking... Clones spread around the world? 'One for all'
>> kind of uniformity. /Meaning many little ICANNs all around. /
>>
>> *Globalization*: this could happen without a network of
>> offices around the world. You can observe a very globalized
>> entity containing so many different elements, co-exisiting,
>> still assembling one strong outlet with a governance of its
>> own, but embracing 'solutions' that could fit more than one
>> single corporation, institution, nation. One voice, many
>> voices... in a single global body. So one ICANN speaking from
>> one point to the many in a global manner of thinking.
>>
>> /Meaning one ICANN with a big global mind./
>>
>> *Transnationalization*: this tends to establish a community
>> of people based in various locations, trying to forget about
>> their local identity, interest or belonging, with the
>> objective to address a more common, regional, transnational,
>> trans-sectorial issue. A way to achieve an understanding of
>> global magnitude.
>>
>> /Meaning one ICANN talking to other minds./
>>
>> - The first option has a few advantages. You keep a greater
>> control over the network, and at the end of the day, you can
>> pretend to be a global minded outlet. Good communication value.
>>
>> - The second option is probably the most difficult to
>> achieve, specially if you are not starting from a fully
>> independent culture. Very challenging when one starts from a
>> private or national basis.
>>
>> - The third option might be a good compromise, if each one
>> puts trust in the other minds ('nods'?). But maybe a more
>> sustainable approach, and ultimately, one that could deliver
>> a true global minded system.
>>
>> Obviously, very much to be criticized, but at least worth
>> trying to explore. And quiet appropriate with the current
>> state of the IG debate.
>>
>> Semantic has a lasting effect over the narrative and the
>> ultimate objective. A little bit like 'multistakeholder'
>> which has emerged from the corporate jargon (to soften
>> counter forces or opponents, executives would convene
>> 'stakeholders' to the table for consultation (trade union,
>> politician...). A pure communication tool. Plus, it has a
>> very poor stable definition and understanding, and an even
>> looser legal impact. Something that usually brings a lot of
>> misunderstandings, deadlocks...
>>
>> All the best,
>>
>> __________________________
>>
>> Jean-Christophe Nothias
>> Editor in Chief
>> jc.nothias at theglobaljournal.net
>> <mailto:jc.nothias at theglobaljournal.net>
>>
>> @jc_nothias
>>
>> Le 29 nov. 2013 à 20:52, Norbert Bollow a écrit :
>>
>> Am Fri, 29 Nov 2013 19:28:57 +0000
>> schrieb Milton L Mueller <mueller at syr.edu
>> <mailto:mueller at syr.edu>>:
>>
>> Recognizing that this is a late intervention (Thursday a big
>> family
>>
>> holiday in the US), is it possible to replace the word
>>
>> "internationalization" with "globalization"? Increasingly
>> we live in
>>
>> a world where nations, and by extension the
>> "inter-national" is not
>>
>> an adequate term to define transborder, global phenomena
>>
>>
>> That's IMO a very valid point. Even though nation states and
>> their
>> governments of course continue to have a significant role, it has
>> certainly become inadequate to try to understand transborder,
>> global
>> phenomena by the method (that was helpful in earlier times) of
>> decomposing into what is happening at the national level plus
>> what is
>> happening in inter-national trade and other areas of
>> inter-national
>> relations.
>>
>> On the other hand, many civil society people including myself
>> are very
>> wary of the term "globalization", as globalization has often
>> increased
>> social injustices while doing nothing to resolve the kinds of
>> concerns
>> that the further "internationalization" of ICANN is intended
>> to address.
>>
>> Maybe yet another term could be used???
>>
>> Greetings,
>> Norbert
>>
>> ____________________________________________________________
>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>> governance at lists.igcaucus.org
>> <mailto:governance at lists.igcaucus.org>
>> To be removed from the list, visit:
>> http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
>>
>> For all other list information and functions, see:
>> http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
>> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
>> http://www.igcaucus.org/
>>
>> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>>
>>
>> ____________________________________________________________
>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>> governance at lists.igcaucus.org
>> <mailto:governance at lists.igcaucus.org>
>> To be removed from the list, visit:
>> http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
>>
>> For all other list information and functions, see:
>> http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
>> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
>> http://www.igcaucus.org/
>>
>> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>> <http://translate.google.com/translate_t>
>>
>>
>> ____________________________________________________________
>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>> governance at lists.igcaucus.org
>> <mailto:governance at lists.igcaucus.org>
>> To be removed from the list, visit:
>> http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
>>
>> For all other list information and functions, see:
>> http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
>> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
>> http://www.igcaucus.org/
>>
>> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>>
>>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
> governance at lists.igcaucus.org <mailto:governance at lists.igcaucus.org>
> To be removed from the list, visit:
> http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
>
> For all other list information and functions, see:
> http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
> http://www.igcaucus.org/
>
> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20131130/50f43ef8/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
For all other list information and functions, see:
http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
http://www.igcaucus.org/
Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
More information about the Governance
mailing list