[governance] IGC Nomcom results and final report
joy
joy at apc.org
Wed Nov 27 22:06:18 EST 2013
yes, totally agree - and thanks to the NomCom for this work
Best
Joy
On 28/11/2013 8:26 a.m., Anja Kovacs wrote:
> That's a great slate of candidates! Congratulations to all those
> selected as nominees, and thank you so much to Ian and the NomCom for
> their great work on this difficult task.
>
> Best regards,
> Anja
>
>
> On 27 November 2013 20:57, Stuart Hamilton <Stuart.Hamilton at ifla.org
> <mailto:Stuart.Hamilton at ifla.org>> wrote:
>
> Dear Ian and colleagues on the Nomcom
>
>
>
> Many thanks for your deliberations and hard (and swift) work!
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
>
>
> Stuart
>
>
>
>
>
> Stuart Hamilton
>
> Director of Policy and Advocacy
>
> International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions
> (IFLA)
>
> P.O. Box 95312
> 2509 CH The Hague
> Netherlands
>
>
>
> 00 31 70 314 0884
>
>
>
> Twitter: @ifladpa
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:*governance-request at lists.igcaucus.org
> <mailto:governance-request at lists.igcaucus.org>
> [mailto:governance-request at lists.igcaucus.org
> <mailto:governance-request at lists.igcaucus.org>] *On Behalf Of
> *Mawaki Chango
> *Sent:* 27 November 2013 15:55
> *To:* Internet Governance; Ian Peter
> *Subject:* Re: [governance] IGC Nomcom results and final report
>
>
>
> Cher Ian, Tous,
>
>
>
> Je voudrais exprimer ma gratitude aux membres du Comité de
> Nomination, et particulièrement a leur chef non-votant, sur le
> travail impeccable accompli malgré la cacophonie ambiante et la
> pression du temps. Je suis honoré de figurer parmi vos choix de
> potentiels envoyés de la société civile au MAG.
>
>
>
> Cordialement,
>
>
>
> Mawaki
>
>
> -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
> Mawaki Chango, PhD
>
> Founder, DIGILEXIS Consulting
>
> http://www.digilexis.com <http://www.digilexis.com/>
>
> m.chango at digilexis.com <mailto:m.chango at digilexis.com>
>
> twitter.com/digilexis <https://twitter.com/digilexis>
> twitter.com/dig_mawaki <https://twitter.com/dig_mawaki>
>
> Skype: digilexis
>
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 2:37 PM, William Drake
> <william.drake at uzh.ch <mailto:william.drake at uzh.ch>> wrote:
>
> +1 Thanks Ian and the nomcom for your work and support.
>
>
>
> Bill
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Nov 27, 2013, at 3:24 PM, Nnenna <nne75 at yahoo.com
> <mailto:nne75 at yahoo.com>> wrote:
>
>
>
> Dear Ian, all
>
>
>
> Thanks for a good work done under strict conditions in an urgent
> manner.
>
> Considering the fact that a lot of collaboration has gone on in
> this year's MAG nominations, please permit me to say that it is an
> achievement.
>
>
>
> Thank you Ian, thank you nomcom people. Thank you to other
> could-have-been nominees.
>
>
>
> Is it possible to being now to gather new issues on the MAG? So
> that whoever is retained will at least know how best to tackle things.
>
>
>
> Best regards
>
>
>
> Nnenna
>
>
>
> @nnenna | Skype - nnenna75 | nnennaorg.blogspot.com
> <http://nnennaorg.blogspot.com>
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, November 27, 2013 9:21 AM, Ian Peter
> <ian.peter at ianpeter.com <mailto:ian.peter at ianpeter.com>> wrote:
>
>
>
> I am pleased to report the following results from the Nomcom
> formed by Internet Governance Caucus to consider names for the IGF
> Multistakeholder Advisory Group (MAG).
>
>
>
>
>
> RECOMMENDED NEW MEMBERS
>
>
>
> Nnenna Nwakanma
>
> Bertrand de la Chappelle
>
> Stuart Hamilton
>
> Sonigitu Ekpe
>
> Matthew Shears
>
> Mawaki Chango
>
>
>
> The above recommended candidates are asked to provide information
> in support of their nominations by filling in the form at
> http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/2012/MAG%202014%20template%20.rtf.
> Copies should be sent urgently to the IGC co ordinators and given
> the tight timeframe you may also wish to send copies direct to the
> IGF Secretariat
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> CURRENT MEMBERS ENDORSED TO CONTINUE AFTER ROTATION
>
>
>
> Anriette Esterhuysen
> William Drake
> Izumi Aizu
> Fatima Cambronero
>
>
>
>
>
> NOMCOM MEMBERS
>
>
>
> The members of the Nomcom, elected by the usual IGC random
> selection process from a pool of 25 volunteers, were
>
> Deirdre Williams
>
> Kerry Brown
>
> Shaila Mistry
>
> David Cake
>
> Jefsey Morfin
>
>
>
> Ian Peter was non-voting Chair.
>
>
>
> PROCESS
>
> Given the short time frame available, IGC Co-ordinators called for
> nominations on line prior to the Nomcom being formed. In order to
> encourage more nominations, the Nomcom announced it would continue
> to receive nominations until midnight UTC Thursday November 21.
>
> The following nominations were received within the advertised
> period (one nomination was less than an hour late and was accepted
> by the Nomcom)
>
> Nnenna Nwakanma *
>
> Bertrand de la Chappelle*
>
> Stuart Hamilton*
>
> Sonigitu Ekpe*
>
> Matthew Shears*
>
> Mawaki Chango*
>
> Mishi Choudhary
> Asif Kabani
> Rudi Vansnick
> Imran Ahmed Shah
> Fouad Bajwa
>
>
>
> The Nomcom also emailed all existing civil society members of the
> MAG, asking whether they would like their names to be put forward
> for endorsement by the IGC Nomcom. Responses were received from
> (some before our emails)
>
>
>
> Anriette Esterhuysen *
> William Drake *
> Izumi Aizu *
> Fatima Cambronero *
> Lillian Nalwoga
>
>
>
> In both categories, those with an asterisk after their name are
> our recommendations.
>
>
>
> PROCESS
>
>
>
> The Nomcom decided on a set of Selection Criteria after
> discussion, and advised these on the IGC list. The criteria are
> mentioned below. The Nomcom then weighted all criteria in
> importance ( giving a weighting between 1 and 10 to each
> criteria). The weightings are in brackets after the criteria
> below. Candidates were then scored with a score between 1 and 10
> against each criteria.
>
> No weightings applied to gender and geographic balance, as this
> criteria was applied in arriving at a final slate after weighted
> average scores for candidates against other criteria were compiled)
>
> Note: the scores against criteria were intended as a guide to
> selection only, to bypass a lot of discussion in our very tight
> time frames. They did serve to make clear some candidates who were
> clearly favoured, some who were not, but did leave a group in the
> middle whose scores were close and whose credentials for inclusion
> were then compared further, particularly with intentions to
> achieve better geographic and gender balance.
>
> 1. Regular contributor to civil society networks including the IGC (6)
> 2. Consultative style with members of civil society networks
> including the IGC (8)
> 3. Knowledge of/ previous experience with IGF, including remote
> participation (6.5)
> 4. Knowledge of the UN system (5)
> 5. Able to communicate the diverse range of issues, views and
> perspectives
> held by civil society.(8.5)
> 6.Able to devote the time, resources and effort necessary to
> contribute constructively to MAG deliberations (9)
> 7. Willing and able to report and update civil society networks
> including the IGC on issues and progress (8)
>
> 8. Gender and geographic balance
>
> All Nomcom members provided scores against at least some of the
> candidates. 4 of 5 Nomcom members provided scores for all
> candidates, an exceptionally good result given the tight
> timeframes involved.
>
> Considering these scores, Nomcom members then decided on a final
> slate reflecting as best possible some natural differences of
> emphasis to come to a mutual recommendation. Several members
> expressed some disappointment that the range and communicated
> attributes of those nominated made achieving balance very
> difficult. In particular, more women as candidates and more
> candidates from regions we were not able to represent would have
> been very welcome. This may partially be a factor of the very
> limited timeframe under which we operated – however, it would have
> been even more limited had the co –coordinators not taken the
> initiative to call for candidates while the Nomcom was being formed.
>
> I must as non voting Chair thank the Nomcom members for their
> dedicated work, a not inconsiderable effort to decide on criteria
> and assess candidates in this limited timeframe. They really did
> good work on your behalf.
>
>
>
> Ian Peter
>
> Non voting chair
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
> governance at lists.igcaucus.org
> <mailto:governance at lists.igcaucus.org>
> To be removed from the list, visit:
> http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
>
> For all other list information and functions, see:
> http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
> http://www.igcaucus.org/
>
> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
> governance at lists.igcaucus.org
> <mailto:governance at lists.igcaucus.org>
> To be removed from the list, visit:
> http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
>
> For all other list information and functions, see:
> http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
> http://www.igcaucus.org/
>
> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
> governance at lists.igcaucus.org
> <mailto:governance at lists.igcaucus.org>
> To be removed from the list, visit:
> http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
>
> For all other list information and functions, see:
> http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
> http://www.igcaucus.org/
>
> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
> <http://translate.google.com/translate_t>
>
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
> governance at lists.igcaucus.org
> <mailto:governance at lists.igcaucus.org>
> To be removed from the list, visit:
> http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
>
> For all other list information and functions, see:
> http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
> http://www.igcaucus.org/
>
> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>
>
>
>
> --
> Dr. Anja Kovacs
> The Internet Democracy Project
>
> +91 9899028053 | @anjakovacs
> www.internetdemocracy.in <http://www.internetdemocracy.in/>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20131128/6cf016fe/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
For all other list information and functions, see:
http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
http://www.igcaucus.org/
Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
More information about the Governance
mailing list