[governance] Request to reconsider

Mazzone, Giacomo mazzone at ebu.ch
Wed Nov 27 15:29:15 EST 2013


I also recognise myself in the silent majority described as well by Ninenna and i fully support her invitation.
Giacomo
Ps: you see ? For once you've obliged me to get out from the silence...

From: Anriette Esterhuysen [mailto:Anriette at apc.org]
Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2013 09:03 PM
To: governance at lists.igcaucus.org <governance at lists.igcaucus.org>; Grace Githaiga <ggithaiga at hotmail.com>
Subject: RE: [governance] Request to reconsider

Agree.



Sent from Samsung Mobile



-------- Original message --------
From: Grace Githaiga <ggithaiga at hotmail.com>
Date:
To: governance at lists.igcaucus.org
Subject: RE: [governance] Request to reconsider


+ 1 Nnenna.

________________________________
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 03:58:17 -0800
From: nne75 at yahoo.com
To: nb at bollow.ch; governance at lists.igcaucus.org
Subject: [governance] Request to reconsider

Dear Norbert,

As at yesterday night, which was really early this morning, I was still exchanging mails with you. I no longer speak a whole lot on this list for some reasons that we have mentioned at one time or another: the undermining, the attack, the heavy flow of email, some listers' overbearing attitude etc

It is true that so many things are wrong with the IGC list at the moment, and we are all aware of it.  Maybe we have not had the opportunity to say it openly, but here are a few truths:

  1.  The IGC is the widest, oldest Civil Society network that has followed the WSIS and the IG issues
  2.  We have a history, of collaboration, of team work and of producing joint actions
  3.  We chose you and Sala. We did, because we felt you two  are good, qualified and  have the personality to lead us
  4.  Being the IGC Coordinator is not a small task, the proof is that not many can/want to step into your shoes.
  5.  We recognise that IGC Coordinatorship is tasking: time wise, emotionally, physically, bandwidth wise, health wise and even financially.

I have been on this list before it was created.  When the caucus was hosted elsewhere, before we ever drafted a charter...

I'm somehow part of the silent majority and I'm happy to answer the question "why are you no longer contributing to IGC?" if anybody asks me.
So on behlalf of some of the silent majority, who still believe in your leadership, in your energy, who appreciate your contribution..

I ask that you reconsider.

Thank you in advance.

Nnenna

@nnenna | Skype - nnenna75 | nnennaorg.blogspot.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

**************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by the mailgateway
**************************************************
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20131127/51194597/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t


More information about the Governance mailing list