[governance] IGC Nomcom results and final report

Pascal Bekono pbekono at gmail.com
Wed Nov 27 05:13:53 EST 2013


Good job Ian & Nomcom members

Congratulations to nominees, it's a relevant panel !

regards,

pascal

2013/11/27, Suresh Ramasubramanian <suresh at hserus.net>:
> Fine choices all. My compliments to the Nomcom, and to Ian.
> And congratulations to the nominees.
>
> --srs (iPad)
>
>> On 27-Nov-2013, at 14:50, "Ian Peter" <ian.peter at ianpeter.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> I am pleased to report the following results from the Nomcom formed by
>> Internet Governance Caucus to consider names for the IGF Multistakeholder
>> Advisory Group (MAG).
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> RECOMMENDED NEW MEMBERS
>>
>>
>>
>> Nnenna Nwakanma
>> Bertrand de la Chappelle
>> Stuart Hamilton
>> Sonigitu Ekpe
>> Matthew Shears
>> Mawaki Chango
>>
>> The above recommended candidates are asked to provide information in
>> support of their nominations by filling in the form at
>> http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/2012/MAG%202014%20template%20.rtf. Copies
>> should be sent urgently to the IGC co ordinators and given the tight
>> timeframe you may also wish to send copies direct to the IGF Secretariat
>>
>>
>>
>> CURRENT MEMBERS ENDORSED TO CONTINUE AFTER ROTATION
>>
>> Anriette Esterhuysen
>> William Drake
>> Izumi Aizu
>> Fatima Cambronero
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> NOMCOM MEMBERS
>>
>>
>>
>> The members of the Nomcom, elected by the usual IGC random selection
>> process from a pool of 25 volunteers, were
>>
>> Deirdre Williams
>>
>> Kerry Brown
>>
>> Shaila Mistry
>>
>> David Cake
>>
>> Jefsey Morfin
>>
>>
>>
>> Ian Peter was non-voting Chair.
>>
>>
>>
>> PROCESS
>>
>> Given the short time frame available, IGC Co-ordinators called for
>> nominations on line prior to the Nomcom being formed. In order to
>> encourage more nominations, the Nomcom announced it would continue to
>> receive nominations until midnight UTC Thursday November 21.
>>
>> The following nominations were received within the advertised period (one
>> nomination was less than an hour late and was accepted by the Nomcom)
>>
>> Nnenna Nwakanma *
>> Bertrand de la Chappelle*
>> Stuart Hamilton*
>> Sonigitu Ekpe*
>> Matthew Shears*
>> Mawaki Chango*
>> Mishi Choudhary
>> Asif Kabani
>> Rudi Vansnick
>> Imran Ahmed Shah
>> Fouad Bajwa
>>
>>
>>
>> The Nomcom also emailed all existing civil society members of the MAG,
>> asking whether they would like their names to be put forward for
>> endorsement by the IGC Nomcom. Responses were received from (some before
>> our emails)
>>
>>
>>
>> Anriette Esterhuysen *
>> William Drake *
>> Izumi Aizu  *
>> Fatima Cambronero *
>> Lillian Nalwoga
>>
>>
>>
>> In both categories, those with an asterisk after their name are our
>> recommendations.
>>
>>
>>
>> PROCESS
>>
>>
>>
>> The Nomcom decided on a set of Selection Criteria after discussion, and
>> advised these on the IGC list. The criteria are mentioned below. The
>> Nomcom then weighted all criteria in importance ( giving a weighting
>> between 1 and 10 to each criteria). The weightings are in brackets after
>> the criteria below.  Candidates were then scored with a score between 1
>> and 10 against each criteria.
>>
>> No weightings applied to gender and geographic balance, as this criteria
>> was applied in arriving at a final slate after weighted average scores for
>> candidates against other criteria were compiled)
>>
>> Note: the scores against criteria were intended as a guide to selection
>> only, to bypass a lot of discussion in our very tight time frames. They
>> did serve to make clear some candidates who were clearly favoured, some
>> who were not, but did leave a group in the middle whose scores were close
>> and whose credentials for inclusion were then compared further,
>> particularly with intentions to achieve better geographic and gender
>> balance.
>>
>> 1. Regular contributor to civil society networks including the IGC (6)
>> 2. Consultative style with members of civil society networks including the
>> IGC (8)
>> 3. Knowledge of/ previous experience with IGF, including remote
>> participation (6.5)
>> 4. Knowledge of the UN system (5)
>> 5. Able to communicate the diverse range of issues, views and perspectives
>>
>> held by civil society.(8.5)
>> 6.Able to devote the time, resources and effort necessary to contribute
>> constructively to MAG deliberations (9)
>> 7. Willing and able to report and update civil society networks including
>> the IGC on issues and progress (8)
>>
>> 8. Gender and geographic balance
>>
>> All Nomcom members provided scores against at least some of the
>> candidates. 4 of 5 Nomcom members provided scores for all candidates, an
>> exceptionally good result given the tight timeframes involved.
>>
>> Considering these scores, Nomcom members then decided on a final slate
>> reflecting as best possible some natural differences of emphasis to come
>> to a mutual recommendation. Several members expressed some disappointment
>> that the range and communicated attributes of those nominated made
>> achieving balance very difficult. In particular, more women as candidates
>> and more candidates from regions we were not able to represent would have
>> been very welcome. This may partially be a factor of the very limited
>> timeframe under which we operated – however, it would have been even more
>> limited had the co –coordinators not taken the initiative to call for
>> candidates while the Nomcom was being formed.
>>
>> I must as non voting Chair thank the Nomcom members for their dedicated
>> work, a not inconsiderable effort to decide on criteria and assess
>> candidates in this limited timeframe. They really did good work on your
>> behalf.
>>
>>
>>
>> Ian Peter
>>
>> Non voting chair
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ____________________________________________________________
>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>>     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
>> To be removed from the list, visit:
>>     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
>>
>> For all other list information and functions, see:
>>     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
>> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
>>     http://www.igcaucus.org/
>>
>> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>

-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t


More information about the Governance mailing list