[governance] Inter-stakeholder issues in a multi-stakeholder environment

Sonigitu Ekpe soekpe at gmail.com
Tue Nov 26 11:28:36 EST 2013


+McTim. Thanks for that "all stakeholders come together as co-equals".

Sonigitu Ekpe Aji :-@ SEA

"Life becomes more meaningful; when we think of others, positively."

+234 8027510179
On Nov 26, 2013 1:42 PM, "McTim" <dogwallah at gmail.com> wrote:

> Mawaki,
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 7:27 AM, Mawaki Chango <kichango at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 4:53 PM, Deirdre Williams <
>> williams.deirdre at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I began this message 12 days ago in response to a thread started by
>>> Michael Gurstein
>>>  Let's Get Real Folks--Re: [governance] Re: [bestbits] DISCLOSURE
>>> REQUEST Re: Funding Available for Strengthening Civil Society
>>> I gave up. Now I am encouraged to try again by this new thread
>>> Re: [governance] Inter-stakeholder issues in a multi-stakeholder
>>> environment
>>> begun by George Sadowsky.
>>>
>>> Is there any way to shift the focus from the people to the issues?
>>> In the final analysis everyone belongs to civil society. That point was
>>> made by a representative of a local telecommunications company at a recent
>>> workshop on IXPs held in Saint Lucia. As he said, his children also query
>>> the speed of the Internet at home when they have to do their homework. The
>>> only people excluded from civil society are incarcerated prisoners, and
>>> that also is a statement that can be questioned. If I understand him
>>> correctly George Sadowsky is making the same point. Civil society is us -
>>> all of us.
>>>
>>
>> Sure! We may declare everybody is CS and expect any institutional policy
>> process to open mike to whoever walks in and requests to speak as CS. From
>> my part, I was working on the basis of assumptions I thought were widely
>> recognized as part of the current landscape --and even an inevitable part.
>> If we want to talk about _multistakeholder_ processes, then we cannot but
>> recognize multiple stakeholders, thus boundaries.
>>
>
>
> The above only applies if you are talking about the Geneva-centric IG
> landscape.  What I call "meta-IG".
>
> Here is an example where it does not apply at all.  All "stakeholders"
> come together as co-equals, with zero boundaries.
>
> [Version Francaise ci-dessous]
> Dear Colleagues,
>
> Please note that AFRINIC-19, currently being held in Abidjan, Cote
> D'Ivoire can be followed remotely.
>
> Watch our live webcast here:
> http://meeting.afrinic.net/afrinic-19/en/meeting/live
>
> Listen to the live audio stream here:
> http://meeting.afrinic.net/afrinic-19/en/meeting/live#audio-stream
>
> Participate, send a comment and discuss via Jabber:
> http://meeting.afrinic.net/afrinic-19/en/agenda/participate-online
>
> Follow us on Twitter: @AFRINIC, @AFRINIC19
> Like our Facebook page: facebook.com/afrinic
> ----------------------------
>
> Chers Collegues,
>
> Veuillez noter que vous pouvez participer en ligne a la reunion
> AFRINIC-19, qui se tient actuellement a Abidjan, Cote D'Ivoire.
>
> Suivez les videos live ici:
> http://meeting.afrinic.net/afrinic-19/fr/meeting/live
>
> Ecoutez au live audio stream ici:
>
> http://meeting.afrinic.net/afrinic-19/fr/meeting/live#transmission-audio-en-continu
>
> Participez, envoyez un commentaire et discutez via Jabber:
> http://meeting.afrinic.net/afrinic-19/fr/programme/participation-en-ligne
>
> Suivez nous sur Twitter: @AFRINIC, @AFRINIC19
> Aimer notre page Facebook: facebook.com/afrinic
>
>
>
>>  If we have set up IGC as a membership structure, then we have
>> necessarily identified criteria for membership, thus boundaries.
>>
>
> Correct, because we are so focused on Geneva and the "political power"
> that SGs have in those processes.
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
>
> McTim
> "A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A route
> indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>      governance at lists.igcaucus.org
> To be removed from the list, visit:
>      http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
>
> For all other list information and functions, see:
>      http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
>      http://www.igcaucus.org/
>
> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20131126/795683aa/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t


More information about the Governance mailing list