[governance] BMP} Statement on Process and Objectives for the Global Multistakeholder Meeting on the Future of Internet Governance

[Norbert Bollow]

On the pad, someone is suggesting to change

"1) Internationalisation of ICANN and IANA: The Global Meeting
should aim at develping a concrete solution how the desired
internationalization can be achieved."

to

"1) Internationalisation of ICANN and IANA: The Global Meeting should
aim at developing a number of possible solutions on how this desired
internationalization can be achieved."


I'd like to request the author of this change to explain the reasoning
behind it.

My current perspective is that the main benefit of a high-level meeting
as seems to be planned for Brazil should be that it could provide an
opportunity to reach a decision on choosing a specific solution
from among the various possibilities. 

If the choice is not made then and there, when and where will it be
made?


Greetings,
Norbert


Am Mon, 25 Nov 2013 22:02:48 +0100
schrieb Norbert Bollow <nb at bollow.ch>:

> Dear all
> 
> From Carlos Afonso I have learned that it would be valuable at the
> present stage for civil society networks like the IGC to make
> statements in regard to the planned Global Multistakeholder Meeting
> aiming at ensuring that the process will be a genuinely open (in
> particular to all kinds of civil society perspectives)
> multistakeholder process -- similar to what APC has already
> emphasized in a recent statement.
> 
> I've set up a pad with an initial draft:
> 
> http://igcaucus.org:9001/p/brazil2014-process-objectives
> 
> This initial text has been very significantly inspired by (and in some
> parts in fact copied verbatim from) the relevant parts of APC's
> statement (if these parts of the statement end up going through the
> IGC consensus process unchanged, we should probably give explicit
> credit in some way.)
> 
> Here's a copy of this initial draft text:
> 
> --snip-----------------------------------------------------------------
> Statement of the Civil Society Internet Governance Caucus on Process
> and Objectives for the Global Multistakeholder Meeting on the Future
> of Internet Governance
> 
> As an international civil society network that has emerged from the
> WSIS process, the Internet Governance Caucus sees the planned Global
> Multistakeholder Meeting on the Future of Internet Governance as a
> huge opportunity.
> 
> In order for this opportunity to be fully utilized and not wasted, we
> urge the organizers to base the Global Meeting on a democratic
> deliberative process. In particular,
> 
>   * Transparent, open, inclusive and participatory mechanisms must be
>     established for the involvement of the widest possible variety of
>     stakeholders, in the planning and organisation of the summit, from
>     its inception, both in regard to issues of processes and
> substance.
> 
>   * Participation in the meeting should be linked to an online
>     consultation process similar to the one successfully employed by
>     Brazilian government and society to draft the “Marco Civil”, and
> in the selection of participants preference should be given to people
>     and institutions who have participated actively in this online
>     process through making written submissions. This should be the
> case for all the stakeholders, including governments.
> 
>   * Drafting groups responsible for capturing outputs should be
>     appointed prior to the event, and include representatives from a
>     wide variety of stakeholder groups.
> 
> The Global Meeting should be focused on creating, through accountable
> and transparent processes, concrete outcome documents in these two
> main areas:
> 
> 1) Internationalisation of ICANN and IANA: The Global Meeting
> should aim at develping a concrete solution how the desired
> internationalization can be achieved.
> 
> 2) An international set of principles (or a civil framework) for
> internet policy making that are fully harmonised with existing human
> rights agreements, especially in regard to ensuring in the context of
> Internet communications and cloud computing that any exceptions to the
> "right to privacy" and "right to anonymity" principles are necessary
> and proportionate.
> --snap-----------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Are you in support of IGC making such a statement?
> 
> Do you see needs for changes?
> 
> Greetings,
> Norbert
> 


-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t