[governance] Inter-stakeholder issues in a multi-stakeholder environment

[Suresh Ramasubramanian]

Militants is such an apt word when people are more focused on blowing up bridges rather than building them. Perfectly fine to have some level of differentiation, but wrong to exclude and build walls so that communities are alienated from each other.

--srs (iPad)

> On 26-Nov-2013, at 5:48, Marilia Maciel <mariliamaciel at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>  Lastly, while I take the point that in the end we are all internet users and part of society, some of us are now "serving" as civil society "militants" (sorry, I lack better words) while others are politically active in other sectors, which is absolutely fine. Saying that we are all civil society politically dilutes it and I think we should not do it, even with the positive goal of reaching more proximity and understanding.
> 
> 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20131126/6bd2ea8c/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t