[governance] Proposal by the Government of India to the WGEC

[Anja Kovacs]

The same questions, of whether it was a case of the left hand not knowing
what the right hand was doing, were raised earlier, when the CIRP proposal
was first made, and such questions seemed to be justified when the Minister
of Communications subsequently repeatedly confirmed his commitment to
multistakeholder models of governance, including at such high-profile
events as the Baku IGF. In other words, clearly communication gaps exist
within the Indian government. But to think that the same government would
make the same mistakes on the same issue twice is rather tragic, and
worrying, especially where the absence of consultation is concerned.

Best,
Anja




On 19 November 2013 04:00, Suresh Ramasubramanian <suresh at hserus.net> wrote:

> We need to be even more vigilant when other, nominally CS, individuals or
> organizations have an agenda or propose solutions entirely at cross
> purposes to our interests.
>
> --srs (iPad)
>
> >
> > That is why as CS we need to be really vigilant and demand very clear
> commitments and mechanisms that allow us to be integrally part of proposed
> solutions.
> >
> > Anriette
>



-- 
Dr. Anja Kovacs
The Internet Democracy Project

+91 9899028053 | @anjakovacs
www.internetdemocracy.in
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20131119/b16d231d/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t