[governance] Update on Candidates for MAG Nominees

Jeanette Hofmann jeanette at wzb.eu
Mon Nov 18 09:32:54 EST 2013


All civil society people on the MAG have rotated except for Qusai who 
might or might not be civil society. However, there are several private 
sector members who have been on the MAG from day one.

Anriette suggests that we should not rotate all cs members. I fully 
agree with that. Longer terms can help to make participation more 
effective. However, a second term only makes sense for people who are 
willing to speak up and do some work.
jeanette

Am 18.11.2013 11:39, schrieb Suresh Ramasubramanian:
> Fouad Bajwa [18/11/13 15:01 +0430]:
>> It is critical that some of our MAG colleagues are kept in there and
>> not rotated. I don't know if we noted it or not but there are private
>> sector MAG members continuously on the MAG and have never been rotated
>> off. This is one of the objections that should be raised loudly.
>
> Sorry but why?  If civil society MAG people should be kept on and not
> rotated, why should private sector MAG members be treated differently?
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t


More information about the Governance mailing list