[governance] Update on Candidates for MAG Nominees

Mawaki Chango kichango at gmail.com
Mon Nov 18 06:06:20 EST 2013


I also noted that contradiction. Either you want CS to follow the template
set by private sector or you want to speak against it. Can't have it both
ways.
More generally, I think this line of reasoning is making the assumption
that only those who are, or have already been, on the MAG can be vocal,
influential or strategic (I guess when they have a track record being
such.) But that does not preclude that people who have not been on the MAG,
but are familiar enough or knowledgeable enough of the IG space or have
similar experiences, can be just as effective at that. It will be the work
of the NomCom to assess such things based on the background information
received. Let's not try to pre-empt the process.
Thanks,

Mawaki
p.s. I've seen on this list people urging for the need to bring in "new
blood," and then later on we say otherwise when we please. That's what
happens when we don't have principles to operate on (and sometimes just
reacting to what other stakeholders do.) That being said (and just to state
I agree on some part of this thinking, in the interest of balance), I fully
understand the need to keep on board in the incoming team one key member
from the outgoing team. This could be more than one if we really think
we're left with candidates who are not up to the task.


On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 10:39 AM, Suresh Ramasubramanian
<suresh at hserus.net>wrote:

> Fouad Bajwa [18/11/13 15:01 +0430]:
>
>  It is critical that some of our MAG colleagues are kept in there and
>> not rotated. I don't know if we noted it or not but there are private
>> sector MAG members continuously on the MAG and have never been rotated
>> off. This is one of the objections that should be raised loudly.
>>
>
> Sorry but why?  If civil society MAG people should be kept on and not
> rotated, why should private sector MAG members be treated differently?
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>      governance at lists.igcaucus.org
> To be removed from the list, visit:
>      http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
>
> For all other list information and functions, see:
>      http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
>      http://www.igcaucus.org/
>
> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20131118/6501cea4/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t


More information about the Governance mailing list