[governance] Update on Candidates for MAG Nominees

Carlos A. Afonso ca at cafonso.ca
Sun Nov 17 20:36:10 EST 2013


Anri, you give more reasons for us to make sure that we recommend names committed to these changes.

Eight IGFs have passed and there is an impressive resistance to significant change. Are we choosing our reps wisely?

fraternal regards

--c.a.

------------
C. A. Afonso

-------- Original message --------
From: Anriette Esterhuysen <anriette at apc.org> 
Date: 17-11-2013  20:05  (GMT-03:00) 
To: governance at lists.igcaucus.org 
Subject: Re: [governance] Update on Candidates for MAG Nominees 
 
Dear c.a.

The report of the working group on IGF improvements actually went a long way towards recognising where the IGF is not meeting its mandate, and it does make recommendations for the IGF to do this.

It could have said more - we spent a lot of time evaluating the extent to which the IGF had met its mandate or not, but some of the participants in the group did not want to go into to much detail, in part because they did not want a more empowered IGF.

Nevertheless, speaking as a MAG member for the past year and a half, I think that most people on the MAG at present do want the IGF to do more. 

That era where some of the influential people in the IGF did not want it to achieve anything or take any risks is actually over. Other people on the MAG can share their views.

The bottleneck is capacity and leadership.

Without political leadership, a special adviser, resources, and senior staff at secretariat level the IGF will not break through the     barriers necessary for it to effectively do what paragraph 72 says it should.

Can the MAG change this? I don't think so. I think what we need is for UN member states to make a resolution that goes to the UNGA on strenghtening IGF capacity, and for ALL stakeholder groups to write to the UN SG urging him to appoint the special advisor as soon as possible.

We should ask that the appointment be made in a way that consults all stakeholders. I suspect that is not an option, but we could still ask.

Anriette


On 17/11/2013 22:42, Carlos A. Afonso wrote:
I meant UNSG, of course. Sorry...




------------
C. A. Afonso



-------- Original message --------
From: "Carlos A. Afonso" <ca at cafonso.ca> 
Date: 17-11-2013 18:34 (GMT-03:00) 
To: Ian Peter <ian.peter at ianpeter.com>,governance at lists.igcaucus.org 
Subject: Re: [governance] Update on Candidates for MAG Nominees 


I do hope the Nomcom selects people who have a clear perception that the IGF is not fulfilling its mandate as per the 12 items of para.72 of the Tunis Agenda and commit to a significant change in its actions and approach (please take a look at my WGEC report).

*But* I am not sure how to insert this in the criteria. And an explicit comitment to this might mean rejection by the UNSA...

fraternal regards

--c.a.

ps: I am not a candidate.


------------
C. A. Afonso



-------- Original message --------
From: Ian Peter <ian.peter at ianpeter.com> 
Date: 17-11-2013 17:28 (GMT-03:00) 
To: governance at lists.igcaucus.org 
Subject: Re: [governance] Update on Candidates for MAG Nominees 


 
Just a quick note and update -
 
within 24 hours we will be posting on IGC list the selection criteria to be used by the Nomcom for this years MAG nominations.  Nominees or their nominators will be given an opportunity to provide statements to the MAG in support of their nomination providing background relevant to the nomination.
 
We will at the same time provide a list of nominations received to date, plus the opportunity for late nominations over the next couple of days. This will be short because of our very tight deadlines.
 
More to come within a day.
 
 
Ian Peter
(non voting Nomcom chair)

-- 
------------------------------------------------------
anriette esterhuysen anriette at apc.org
executive director, association for progressive communications
www.apc.org
po box 29755, melville 2109
south africa
tel/fax +27 11 726 1692
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20131117/01b3e810/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t


More information about the Governance mailing list