[governance] Re: [bestbits] [very quick follow up] I*coalition/dialogue = 1net, etc.

[Carolina Rossini]

Hi Morfin,

We did not know about this wiki. Do you know who is moving it forward? The
editor is Sysop, but nothing on him ...

tks


On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 10:41 AM, JFC Morfin <jefsey at jefsey.com> wrote:

> Dear Joana;
> thank you for the information. So far we therefore have now (
> http://bramsummit.org/index.php?title=Brazil_MultiStakeholderism_Summit:
> Community_portal) a grassroots call by (by creation date):
>
> 1. civil society / OpenUse: site:  http://bramsummit.org   mailing list:
> http://www.bramsummit.org/mailman/listinfo/agora_bramsummit.org
> 2. ITU: http://ideas.itu.int/category/1424 mailing list: included.
> Hastily installed. Could be bugged.
> 3. I* coalition/dialogue: <http://1net.org/>1net.org mailing list <
> https://nro.net/mailman/listinfo/i-coordination>https:
> //nro.net/mailman/listinfo/i-coordination
>
> Who's next?
>
> At 15:09 12/11/2013, Joana Varon wrote:
>
>> Dear all,
>> Hello! Sorry for being away on bb threads, I was offline for a few days,
>> I´m catching up with the other emails, but please, find here quick updates
>> on the debates about the I*coalition/dialogue, which now is being called
>> dialogue or 1net:
>>
>
>  - Brazilian summit (that part of the coalition/dialogue, particularly
>> business, remains calling meeting). For that, the dialogue, following our
>> move in Bali, is also suggesting to have 3 representatives from each
>> stakeholder (civil society, business, technical community), to identify 3
>> representatives to participate in the preparations.
>>
>
> I know that the whole current issue is to make believe that the business
> and civil society techies coalesce under the statUS-quo restrained
> architectural culture of the I* $ociety. The problem is that (1) IAB's RFC
> 3869 has well documented why this was not the case (2) you take the risk of
> a technical clash at the summit as the Brazilian FLOSS community will be
> there in force and are technically competent people. I would therefore
> suggest to play lower key in talking of civil society's, business' and
> users' engineers?
>
> At 15:52 12/11/2013, Adam Peake wrote:
>
>> Quick question - in the opening and closing sessions in Bali,
>> representatives of Brazil said the meeting would be open for all to help
>> organize and for all to participate: an open invitation to an open meeting.
>>  Was this discussed on the list, and they instead decided on a more limited
>> steering committee?  (I will try to look at the archives).
>>
>
> If this is a MS summit, it is everybody's summit or it is nothing. Could
> it be any reason why what will be discussed would be different from what
> T&L-paid and remote attendees will want to discuss?
>
> Best
> jfc
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>      bestbits at lists.bestbits.net.
> To unsubscribe or change your settings, visit:
>      http://lists.bestbits.net/wws/info/bestbits
>



-- 
*Carolina Rossini*
*Project Director, Latin America Resource Center*
Open Technology Institute
*New America Foundation*
//
http://carolinarossini.net/
+ 1 6176979389
*carolina.rossini at gmail.com*
skype: carolrossini
@carolinarossini
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20131112/f9a0cf2b/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t