[governance] Re: [bestbits] DISCLOSURE REQUEST Re: Funding Available for Strengthening Civil Society...
JFC Morfin
jefsey at jefsey.com
Mon Nov 11 18:01:56 EST 2013
Dear Mawaki,
two comments:
At 20:28 10/11/2013, Mawaki Chango wrote:
>#3 That procedure does not have to be carried out publicly on a
>discussion list such as these ones --for, among other things, the
>safety reasons and possible risks that have already been mentioned.
>A structure may be put in place (NomCom?) to receive such statements.
We know from experience there only are public discussions, with the
help of NSA and/or wikileaks and co. As E.S (Eric Schmidt, not Edward
Snowden) puts it: if you do not want something to be published on the
internet do not do it.
>there are basically three ways for having money: i) you sell
>something, goods or services; ii) you tax someone else; or iii)
>someone chooses to give you the money for whatever reason, possibly
>including a service you didn't even set out to sell. In CS we do at
>least a little bit of the three --through grant proposals or
>consultancy, member dues (albeit with less dire consequences than
>defaulting on your income tax), and fundraising or donations CS orgs
>receive. But it looks like the latter category is what supports the
>most CS advocacy activities. That makes you think twice about where
>we actually are on the power map. Maybe there is some solace to be
>found in the fact that many of the sources CS orgs get money from
>are also part of CS, to begin with: private citizens who once were
>industrious enough and with enough ingenuity to become wealthy and
>set up foundations or other charity orgs. Short of that, CS would
>perhaps have to receive the bulk of its money from the people who
>tax other people.
The origin of the money is not a problem. The problem is the
non-disclosure. There are several ways around that can be explored:
* a CS oath, as for the Olympics.
* the sponsorship to be disclosed at registration.
* the creation of a CSFoundation to collect and attribute fundings in
a fairly ballanced manner and published policy.
Its CSnomcom list would gather reps from all the participating CS
organizations.
jfc
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
For all other list information and functions, see:
http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
http://www.igcaucus.org/
Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
More information about the Governance
mailing list