[governance] Potential IGC letter to US gov (was Re: NET NEUTRALITY AND MORE)

[parminder]

On Tuesday 28 May 2013 09:34 PM, William Drake wrote:
>
> Under your able baton, the caucus is currently unable to organize a meeting during an IGF consultation, unable to provide a written input to the consultation or the MAG meeting, unable to provide an input the WTPF, unable to provide a letter to the chair of the WGEC on meeting openness (luckily he's willing to try without the support), unable to do any of the things it used to do that garnered broad support from the diverse membership,

This is an absolutely unacceptable level of brow beating of a 
co-coordinator.... Such a thing has never happened earlier... The caucus 
cannot function like this. Either co-cos issue a joint statement on 
this, or the appeals committee take a suo motto notice - whether there 
is a provision for this or not. And members who think either way should 
speak up. Let us fully discuss this.

My view; few co-cos have done their work as diligently as Norbert did. 
But he failed to stay on the right side of 'political-correctness' of 
the dominant class of this list, in times when global IG landscape has 
become politically very hot, and things have gone bare knuckled...

parminder

> consistent with our purpose in starting this in Feb. 2003.



> But you would like to write to the US government and demand that it explain itself to you and Parminder?  Seriously?




>
> No, this would not be reasonable.
>
> Bill
>
>


-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t