[governance] On acceptable and unacceptable criticism

[Suresh Ramasubramanian]

I dont characterize you specifically as anti american - merely feel that you need some operational background to possibly modify your economic theories on the internet.  Especially the "single rooters" but there is more jargon there that I fear will lead to you talking past anybody with a technical background, however much economics they happen to know.

--srs (iPad)

On 28-May-2013, at 11:06, Riaz K Tayob <riaz.tayob at gmail.com> wrote:

> Why does it go too far?
> 
> If one is engaging in civil society one can have one's views, but at least must be open to persuasion, or no?
> 
> If what you argue is true then I too have lots of motive to dredge up and raise on this list, particularly regarding collaborators and what I call the paternalistic liberal bent. I am very happy to discuss this in terms of motives and substance - it was not fruitful in the past, but hey I am already boxed in as anti-American (on a very loose charaterisation as I would join self-hating Americans who share my crits) so that would give me and a bunch of us some real space to move on what is a constrained list at best.
> 
> Norbert, I for one find the recent discussions much more amenable to engagement, the decorum is great, and have noted much more participation. It is important that the role you play be treated with the decorum it deserves, even if you personally may have issues with people. I vote that the list is MUCH better since your interventions... Does anyone feel like this too? Or is the 'consensus' with Avri in general approach or tenor?
> 
> Riaz
> 
> On 2013/05/27 12:27 PM, Avri Doria wrote:
>> On 27 May 2013, at 11:21, Norbert Bollow wrote:
>> 
>>>  or when directed
>>> against actions of a coordinator (actions of coordinators can be
>>> legitimately discussed and --if that is desired-- appealed, but
>>> disparaging remarks about actions of a coordinator are just as much
>>> against the posting rules as personal attacks against anyone else.)
>> this goes too far.
>> please warm me now
>> 
>> avri
> 
> 
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
> To be removed from the list, visit:
>     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
> 
> For all other list information and functions, see:
>     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
>     http://www.igcaucus.org/
> 
> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t

-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t