AW: [governance] WSIS 10+

["Kleinwächter, Wolfgang"]

Hi
 
sorry for my misundestanding. I was in the Popow room and I had only the english version and misunderstood what he had said. However I would avoid to introduce new confusing language to replace what we already have in the Tunis Agenda describing what we want to have (IG definition etc.) 
 
 
w

 
________________________________

Von: pouzin at gmail.com im Auftrag von Louis Pouzin (well)
Gesendet: Mo 20.05.2013 05:06
An: governance at lists.igcaucus.org; Jean-Louis FULLSACK
Cc: Kleinwächter, Wolfgang; FouadBajwa; CarlosA.Afonso; AndreaGlorioso; McTim; Parminder
Betreff: [governance] WSIS 10+



On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 1:01 AM, Jean-Louis FULLSACK <jlfullsack at orange.fr> wrote:


	 Dear Wolfgang

	

	just to prevent a misunderstanding :

	 I clearly heard (Wednesday morning WSIS + 10 Session, room Popov) Adama sentence (i.e. condemn) the PPP and asking for replacing it by a "PMA" ("Partenariat Multi-Acteurs") since his discourse was in french. He further motivated his proposal saying that this fundamental change responds to the need to have CS playing its necessary role. I also exchanged privately with him and I confirm this statement. 

I heard Adama saying the same thing as Jean-Louis heard.


	Consequently, it was somehow strange to hear the comment of his eminent malian brother Hamadoun Toure, pointing out that the acronym PMA is already used (in french it means Least Developed Country, LDC) and therefore another "thing" should be found.

E.g. MAP (Multi-Actors Partnership) 


	I subscribe to all your comments and views about the due CS implication in the future of WSIS and do hope that somebody of CONGO will succeed in revitalizing the CS eminent role in the near future.

	Alles Gute

	

	Jean-Louis

	- - -    
	

	> Message du 19/05/13 17:53
	> De : ""Kleinwächter, Wolfgang"" 
	> A : governance at lists.igcaucus.org, "Jean-Louis FULLSACK" , governance at lists.igcaucus.org, "FouadBajwa" , "CarlosA.Afonso" 
	> Copie à : "AndreaGlorioso" , "McTim" , "Parminder" 
	> Objet : AW: [governance] WSIS 10+

	> 
	> Jean Louis,
	> 
	> thanks for your quick reply and first comments. 
	> 
	> I agree fully that the WSIS++ has to go far beyond the areas where the IGC is active. I think it is a great idea to revitalize the wsis-cs list. I have no idea whether this list is still alive. In case not, we have to open a new list. 
	> 
	> I also fully agree that in the WSIS 10+ process, as it is pushed forward at the moment by the "triumvirat" ITU, UNESCO and UNDP, civil society is totally sidelined and pushed back to a pre-Geneva situation were some handpicked CS individuals or representatives were invited to make a statement just to give the illusion that all stakeholders are included. I was also shocked to hear that Adama went back to a "public-private partnership" model! Where is his memory? 
	> 
	> This is unacceptable. But it needs an organized CS. We learned some lessons on the road to Tunis, but we have to push now the re-start button. 
	> [snip]
	

 

-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t