[IRPCoalition] [governance] Request for comment on proposal for IGF multistakeholder opinions

[Adam Peake]

Hi Jeremy

Careful with words please.  There were no "civil society
representatives at the IEG".  Some good people attended and may have
had some well considered opinions.  But they were (are?) no one's
representatives.

Adam



On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 7:02 PM, Jeremy Malcolm <jeremy at ciroap.org> wrote:
> On 19/05/2013, at 4:03 PM, Milton L Mueller <mueller at SYR.EDU> wrote:
>
> I have read the Brazilian resolution at the link you provided (was not
> allowed to enter the WTPF meetings). While I recognize that it is a
> well-intentioned attempt to bridge some of the divides, I cannot support it.
> In fact, I can only view it as a step backwards because of its reversion to
> the language that makes representatives of national governments preeminent
> policy makers and the rest of us nothing more than consultants to them at
> their pleasure. I am referring, of course, to the language about “each in
> their respective roles and responsibilities.”
>
>
> Yes, that is definitely going to be one of the major sticking points, and
> not just for you.  Interestingly though, it is not a red line for everybody.
> WTPF opinion 5 contains the same reference, so it was part of the compromise
> that the civil society representatives at the IEG were willing to accept.  I
> don't like the language either, but on the other hand I don't see it as a
> step backward, since it was part of the agreed language at WSIS.
>
> --
>
> Dr Jeremy Malcolm
> Senior Policy Officer
> Consumers International | the global campaigning voice for consumers
> Office for Asia-Pacific and the Middle East
> Lot 5-1 Wisma WIM, 7 Jalan Abang Haji Openg, TTDI, 60000 Kuala Lumpur,
> Malaysia
> Tel: +60 3 7726 1599
>
> WCRD 2013 – Consumer Justice Now! | Consumer Protection Map:
> https://wcrd2013.crowdmap.com/main | #wcrd2013
>
> @Consumers_Int | www.consumersinternational.org |
> www.facebook.com/consumersinternational
>
> Read our email confidentiality notice. Don't print this email unless
> necessary.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> IRP mailing list
> IRP at lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org
> http://lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/irp
>

-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t