[governance] Industrial Progress, revisited…
parminder
parminder at itforchange.net
Sat May 18 09:22:08 EDT 2013
On Saturday 18 May 2013 05:18 PM, John Curran wrote:
> A interesting article from Seth Godin: http://sethgodin.typepad.com/seths_blog/2013/05/its-thomas-midgeley-day.html
> (Although I expect that idea that business can do rather bad things in the name of innovation in not new to this mailing list...)
A very good warning against giving big business a veto over public
policy decisions, which is what multistakeholderism essentially is, in
the manner it is propagated in global IG today. We will live to repent
it, and those who are pushing it in this manner would be responsible,
which includes a big part of the so called civil society.
I can simply not get over clear statements during WCIT that Google wasnt
an equal stakeholder, which it must be, because it hadnt a vote as govs
had... One sees that kind of sentiment becoming pretty mainstream among
many global IG actors.
parminder
>
> FYI,
> /John
>
> Disclaimer: My views alone. Email did not contain cookies, tracking pixels, embedded scripts, or any other
> innovations at the time of its composition.
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
For all other list information and functions, see:
http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
http://www.igcaucus.org/
Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
More information about the Governance
mailing list